@Glorfindel The presence of your mother's military rank does not say anything about her prowess among women and your mother specifically. The proof of my words is the active number of women firefighters and their ratio to the number of actively serving firefighters men.
@𝔾/𝔾 Ummm. I listed her as source of my claim that there were capable females in the military. The proportions don't matter, there will always be fewer women in a heavily physical job. But there are outliers who CAN get the job done, and I still fail to see why they shouldn't be allowed to perform that job if they can do it to the same standards that a man can.
@zoevandenbergh I'm sorry, but there wasn't a question in your last post. At least I didn't see any question marks. Punctuation sure is nice, it would be appreciated if you could rephrase and tell me what the question was/is.
Let's face it. The standards to be a cop are pretty darn low. I think they should be higher, but all the same, if a woman can complete the entrance tests that a man must complete to get in, then I don't see why they should be excluded.
@Mr. Badger Cool. All the same, that is a fun way to hide behind a term and fail to address logical points because you either don't understand them or don't have a counter. If your position is correct, there will always be a logical counter to an argument made against it.
I'm stuck between laughter and slack-jawed amazement right now. You CANNOT understand or explain what you believe without arguments for seeking the truth. The very definition of logic is that logic is a tool for pursuing truth.
