Message from @Fidel Castro
Discord ID: 638618646159163392
this is an ad hominem argument
but back to what we were discussing yesterday, humans don't have a crime gene, and IQ tests involve vocabulary, something which is taught, not inherent. It is foolish to attribute both purely to genetics
If crime is the incapacity to maintain societal rules, then yes there is a genetic basis for crime.
Different populations have different proclivities to behavioral inhibition.
Not genetically
East Asians are usually far less impulsive than africans because they had selective pressures applied to them, which translated into selecting certain genes compared to another
or maybe their culture suppresses their feelings, telling them to keep in line. East Asian culture is very conservative usually
Just ask the father of DNA
How do you think their culture came to be numb nuts
A recursive pattern of selective pressure
@Fidel Castro Bro,impulsivity is directly attributed to frontal lobe proportions and hormonal balance. Other than nutrition, what else can you attribute to those things outside of genetics?
Material conditions in Africa did not lead to developement of agriculture in many places, meaning that society could not be formed neither could advanced cultures
Someone who is socially ostracised for being gay is much less likely to identify as gay than someone who is accepted for being gay, as an example
Impulse control can be affected by upbringing and experience
europeans and chinks made agriculture ez pz there in less than a decade. Plus africa had better infastructure than china for atleast a hundred years
Certain african countries
If sub-Saharan Africa couldnt develop due to material conditions prior to the intake of latin american trade and its agricultural goods, then they werent exposed to the selective pressures that more sedentary people were @Fidel Castro
thus, under natural selection, would not have developed the same temperament.
Just ask charles darwin on his thoughts on them
Agriculture has only arisen in the last 10,000 years, even for Europeans. That's not a long enough time for substantial genetic difference, but europeans aren't "impulsive"
Btw Karl Marx said that darwinism was the missing piece to communism
In a few letters to engels
@Fidel Castro the variety already existed, it was a matter of selection
not social darwinism though
@Fidel Castro wrong, of digestive systems and neoteny went through major changes in the last 10k years
we know of genetics have had major change
Those features were already present but were selected over other traits
There was a lot of genetic noise
And it turned into a symphony
you arent educated on this, the demographic take overs that occurred in the Holocene and horse domestication is huge @Fidel Castro
only due to selective breeding
I wonder who and what guided that to lead to us
Also you all act like there was never any civilisation in Africa whatsoever. This isn't true.
agriculture wasnt just a product of hunter gather's environments but instead due to sedentary populations who already had a complex social structure developing agriculture and then expanding
Byw fidel castro was a racist
@Fidel Castro the north africans are descended from agriculturalist from the levant
Noone said there wasn't civilization, it just sucks balls except for that one time
not just north africa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mali_Empire
explain this
all of ancient african cultures descent from the natufian