Message from @RandomDiscordAccount
Discord ID: 638619177783132160
@Fidel Castro Bro,impulsivity is directly attributed to frontal lobe proportions and hormonal balance. Other than nutrition, what else can you attribute to those things outside of genetics?
Material conditions in Africa did not lead to developement of agriculture in many places, meaning that society could not be formed neither could advanced cultures
Someone who is socially ostracised for being gay is much less likely to identify as gay than someone who is accepted for being gay, as an example
Impulse control can be affected by upbringing and experience
europeans and chinks made agriculture ez pz there in less than a decade. Plus africa had better infastructure than china for atleast a hundred years
Certain african countries
If sub-Saharan Africa couldnt develop due to material conditions prior to the intake of latin american trade and its agricultural goods, then they werent exposed to the selective pressures that more sedentary people were @Fidel Castro
thus, under natural selection, would not have developed the same temperament.
Just ask charles darwin on his thoughts on them
Agriculture has only arisen in the last 10,000 years, even for Europeans. That's not a long enough time for substantial genetic difference, but europeans aren't "impulsive"
Btw Karl Marx said that darwinism was the missing piece to communism
In a few letters to engels
@Fidel Castro the variety already existed, it was a matter of selection
not social darwinism though
@Fidel Castro wrong, of digestive systems and neoteny went through major changes in the last 10k years
we know of genetics have had major change
Those features were already present but were selected over other traits
There was a lot of genetic noise
And it turned into a symphony
you arent educated on this, the demographic take overs that occurred in the Holocene and horse domestication is huge @Fidel Castro
only due to selective breeding
I wonder who and what guided that to lead to us
Also you all act like there was never any civilisation in Africa whatsoever. This isn't true.
agriculture wasnt just a product of hunter gather's environments but instead due to sedentary populations who already had a complex social structure developing agriculture and then expanding
Byw fidel castro was a racist
@Fidel Castro the north africans are descended from agriculturalist from the levant
Noone said there wasn't civilization, it just sucks balls except for that one time
not just north africa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mali_Empire
explain this
all of ancient african cultures descent from the natufian
@Fidel Castro the mali empire occurred in the same age as Genghis khan and was basically a local tribal leader expanding trade networks with north african Muslims
but they still managed an extensive civilization
it wasnt extensive at all
which supposedly these blacks were not capable of
it lasted 400 years and was pretty big if you look at the map there
it was literally minute in all natures and there are north American tribes that had far less access to trade networks yet did far more
Your axiomatic assertion that agency fundamentally determines reality is flawed.
Civilization itself has only existed for about 7000 years
just if you have writing as requirement but sedentary societies have existed for 13,000 @Fidel Castro
Most of what we do and are is based upon the decisions and actions of the past. You cant just give civilization to people who haven't gone through the proper selective pressures yet.