Message from @Clownley

Discord ID: 423329731400957953


2018-03-14 03:51:31 UTC  

what does that matter?

2018-03-14 03:52:12 UTC  

I have a natural inclination to drink and drive. It's preferable in a lot of cases for me

2018-03-14 03:52:24 UTC  

why is that not a natural desire?

2018-03-14 03:52:39 UTC  

don't give that bullshit

2018-03-14 03:52:56 UTC  

why are some desires untouchable?

2018-03-14 03:52:57 UTC  

saying that shows you're not here to argue honestly

2018-03-14 03:53:03 UTC  

bullshit

2018-03-14 03:53:29 UTC  

just giving a anecdotal example you pulled out of your ass that is unfalsifiable is bullshit

2018-03-14 03:54:00 UTC  

I'm going back to listening to voice

2018-03-14 03:54:14 UTC  

why are some desires more legitimate than others?
you don't think pedophilic desires are legitimate, regardless if they're genetic

2018-03-14 03:54:28 UTC  

no, because they tread on the rights of others

2018-03-14 03:54:41 UTC  

by sharing child porn?

2018-03-14 03:55:00 UTC  

by rapeing children, and/or partaking in an industry which rapes children.

2018-03-14 03:55:25 UTC  

gays also partake in an industry that rapes children and spreads deadly disease

2018-03-14 03:55:42 UTC  

okay, you're just an idiot, "gays rape children", yeah, sure bruh

2018-03-14 03:55:44 UTC  

goodbye

2018-03-14 03:55:49 UTC  

lol very mature

2018-03-14 03:55:59 UTC  

"gays rape children", yeah very mature

2018-03-14 03:59:26 UTC  

didn't Milo say that he personally attended parties where underage boys were being molested?

2018-03-14 04:00:00 UTC  

And that somehow means that the entire gay community is responsible for rapeing children

2018-03-14 04:01:13 UTC  

wasn't my argument it was your in relation to pedophiles

2018-03-14 04:01:20 UTC  

"Those who practice homosexual acts are at leas: 12 times more apt to molest a child sexually, and with suitable corrections for bisexuals (who molest both genders), probably at least 16 times more apt to molest a child."

2018-03-14 04:02:13 UTC  

That doesn't mean you can tread on their civil rights if they don't act on those inclinations, seriously, why are the concepts of civil rights so hard for you to understand.

2018-03-14 04:02:50 UTC  

why do you get to tread on my right to travel based on an arbitrary heuristic chemical test?

2018-03-14 04:03:01 UTC  

^in reference to drunk driving

2018-03-14 04:03:28 UTC  

because you can choose not to drink and drive. That is why just drinking is not illegal.

2018-03-14 04:03:55 UTC  

you can also choose not to express homosexual behaviour
we went over this

2018-03-14 04:04:09 UTC  

and the test isn't arbitrary, it takes into account what is likely to make most people unable to make the correct descisions while driving.

2018-03-14 04:04:25 UTC  

Except homosexuality is a natural state, being drunk is not

2018-03-14 04:04:30 UTC  

they are very different things

2018-03-14 04:05:00 UTC  

the percent they came up with is arbitrary by definition and will never apply to all cases

2018-03-14 04:05:17 UTC  

@meratrix being drunk is a natural state... for the irish

2018-03-14 04:05:22 UTC  

lol

2018-03-14 04:05:29 UTC  

being drunk is entirely natural
that is your personal moral inclination

2018-03-14 04:05:34 UTC  

speaking

2018-03-14 04:05:36 UTC  

You can only ever apply a best fit interpretation because you cannot account for every possible alcohol tolerance

2018-03-14 04:06:05 UTC  

and I cannot account for every single homosexual interaction
but banning it solves the problem

2018-03-14 04:07:39 UTC  

It actually doesn't solve anything, because you are transgressing against someone's civil rights in their natural state, being drunk while driving is not a civil right.

2018-03-14 04:07:47 UTC  

It was never defined as such

2018-03-14 04:07:58 UTC  

being gay was never a civil right