that are 34 completed goals, we cant even finish one fucking airport in berlin

idk about the range

but why not the top speed?

because producing that speed isn't easy for any automotive company, let alone one that treats the car industry like the tech industry

why not, when they have stupid amounts of power at their disposal?

plenty of car companies are able to do so, they just frequently opt to not

instead focusing on track performance where ludicrous top speed doesn't do you as good as low end acceleration and cornering

there are like 4 supercars confirmed to do 250+

you realize that right

4

uh

confirmed by who?

I'm talking stock cars

ah

yeah

when you run into environmental regulations

that happens

by actual speed tests

and also when you try to make it so you can go around a track

that's the thing

that is a ridiculous argument, it has nothing to do with environmental regulations

do you think the veyron was designed for tracks?

if you took the powertrain in a p1 and optimized the cars aero for minimum drag, I'd bet it could hit 250

lol

no

that's what I'm saying

that's why there are so few that do 250

because they're all designed for tracks

because no one cares about being able to do 250

you'll never hit 250

under most circumstances

top speed and power is a bigger selling point than track performance

besides, speed isn't the fun part, cornering is

is it though?

for supercar buyers?

yes

why's that

why do you think the dodge challenger sells well

acceleration

that's not top speed

despite being heavy and terrible on a track