Message from @Fitzydog

Discord ID: 561325786905182211


2019-03-29 10:07:00 UTC  

Clearly fueled by his fear of "anti semetism"

2019-03-29 11:30:24 UTC  

Eh. They are relative. Which is the fucking problem. My culture views others as inferior, just as I see Germans as being of inferior nationality.

2019-03-29 15:16:30 UTC  

Historically, would a king or an emperor have a lot of personal bodyguards? They surely would right? And how many would they usually have?

2019-03-29 15:17:25 UTC  

Trying to figure out how a kingdom and the court look like for my empires in dnd.

2019-03-29 15:25:17 UTC  

It depends on the amount, but the answer is yes

2019-03-29 15:39:09 UTC  

Hmmm okay. Is 8 too many? Or too few?

2019-03-29 15:54:51 UTC  

@MountainMan Well are you going for historical accuracy, or for drama? lol

2019-03-29 15:55:17 UTC  

Historical accuracy.

2019-03-29 15:58:13 UTC  

@MountainMan Okay, well just take note that most of our preconceptions about how monarchies worked are wrong, at least in the US.

I can't say much for the UK

2019-03-29 15:58:29 UTC  

Okay. Very good to know.

2019-03-29 15:59:11 UTC  

The idea of a hereditary authoritarian dictator is not accurate

2019-03-29 20:55:26 UTC  

Tbh pretty much all the commonly held ideas about how pre-modern governments worked are wrong. People are used to having organized states with formal administration, written law, clearly and precisely defined borders, hell even a literate population...

2019-03-29 20:55:52 UTC  

Pre-modern states weren't even states as far as what we would call a proper state nowadays

2019-03-29 20:59:42 UTC  

And the term "monarchy" is extremely vague. Using it is like using "republic" to describe everything from a tribe governed by a council of elders all the way to contemporary France. Plus the terms aren't even discrete - the UK is a monarchy but pretty much any vaguely reasonable person would agree that it's really more of a republic that keeps the old monarchs for pageantry's sake...

2019-03-29 21:05:17 UTC  

Ptolemaic Egypt and XIVth century France had wildly different government structures and ideologies, yet both would be classified as monarchies in common parlance.

2019-03-29 21:07:04 UTC  

Not to mention weird ass examples like the late Holy Roman Empire or Poland-Lithuania...

2019-03-29 23:07:29 UTC  

Or modern day Luxembourg

2019-03-29 23:08:16 UTC  

Which in this modern era, actually gave *more* power to the crown.

2019-03-29 23:09:22 UTC  

Fun fact: In Lichtenstein no law can be passed without the Price Regent's explicit a-OK.

2019-03-29 23:10:26 UTC  

Oh, was I thinking of Lichtenstein?

2019-03-29 23:10:58 UTC  

You might have been, I dunno much about Luxemburg's gov structure

2019-03-29 23:11:17 UTC  

Lichtenstein is a monarchy. Luxembourg is Switzerland-lite

2019-03-29 23:11:52 UTC  

Like a fully independent canton. Don't they vote on new immigrants? lol

2019-03-29 23:12:03 UTC  

I rly have no clue

2019-03-29 23:12:16 UTC  

I never had any interest in that city state

2019-03-29 23:26:15 UTC  

Everyone should be in a city-state

2019-03-29 23:26:55 UTC  

city states are gay

2019-03-29 23:33:35 UTC  

@galesteppes Fuck off statist

2019-03-29 23:34:23 UTC  

city states are for faggots who want to be conquered or cucked

2019-03-29 23:38:15 UTC  

not wrong

2019-03-30 01:29:45 UTC  

city states exist because someone in there is rich enough to own it

2019-03-30 01:30:10 UTC  

usually one family, it's like extreme monarchism which is the opposite of being cucked

2019-03-30 01:56:44 UTC  

Or it's like the upper extreme of a Home Owner's association

2019-03-30 01:56:52 UTC  

Which is what I'm thinking of

2019-03-30 01:59:59 UTC  

@Fitzydog you mean the local stasi club?

2019-03-30 02:00:31 UTC  

No, not really.

Like the AnCap version of an HOA lol

2019-03-30 02:25:09 UTC  

Dual invasion of Iran by US and Soviet forces?

2019-03-30 02:26:15 UTC  

Circa 1979