Message from @Goblin_Slayer_Floki
Discord ID: 584939464279719938
i just woke up tho
the speech actually accuses iraq of the full gamut of WMDs; chemical biological and nuclear
k
@Deleted User its iranian
Oh
Should be Chinese
Though Germany I would split between Iran and Russia
Naw cause China will move and bluster but avoid war at all costs
'Look guys! NYT being faggots and doxxing good natured Hondurans who are fighting bad guys!"
@Tero no they had chemicals. And your finn ass cant convince me otherwise. My eyes didnt lie to me as we ran into cache after cache with chemical arty shells and so on.
And yea that conversation is over.
@Fitzydog I like how that map left isreal blank
<:think_woke:378717098681171988>
No one is a threat to Chad Isreal
@Goblin_Slayer_Floki your conduct in the last two days so soon after being made a mod reflects poorly on this server and the people who come here tbh fam
m8 just get off his dick already
@Tero you obviously dont interact with me often. Otherwise you would know I'm not acting any differently than I usually do. Now, you can continue being butthurt over being called a Finn as a joke. Or you can go cry to someone who gives a shit.
Because I really dont care about your moral finger wagging simply because I dont bow my head to your every word.
that's a funny way of saying "embarrassing inability to admit fault when presented clear evidence to the contrary"
That's a funny way to say, "I'm just a sperg lord on the internet who thinks actual lived experience means nothing to my Google ability." But it's ok. Spergs gotta spaz right?
"my subjective experience trumps facts because you're a sperg" nice argument mate
Hmmm... a report that could be biased vs boots on the ground looking at chemical weapons at my feet. Wonder which I will take. "Subjective experience" lol. By that metric all reports are "subjective experience" and should be thrown out eh?
>imblying there were any chemical weapons turned up by the said boots on the ground
imagine defending an administration which flatly LIED to justify a bogus invasion on a sovereign government
Not implying. I found this numnuts
^
He said that already
I did. My own eyes. Hell 1 was even set up in an IED dumbass
Thank gods it didnt go off
The Chlorine would have taken out near half my platoon.
so you're actually claiming to have personally stumbled upon chemical weapons munitions in iraq despite the only official reports of such being inactive specimens from the 80s
There's lots of shit that's not in 'official reports'
^
why would you omit the existence of the thing you justified the war on?
The existence of chemicals were never in doubt
wow much info
that's protecting their own methods
not the enemy
Fucking powel took a sample from an inspector from Iraq to the UN. Chemicals were never in doubt. The "in doubt" was the nuclear and biological.