And yea that conversation is over.

@Fitzydog I like how that map left isreal blank

<:think_woke:378717098681171988>

No one is a threat to Chad Isreal

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki your conduct in the last two days so soon after being made a mod reflects poorly on this server and the people who come here tbh fam

m8 just get off his dick already

@Tero you obviously dont interact with me often. Otherwise you would know I'm not acting any differently than I usually do. Now, you can continue being butthurt over being called a Finn as a joke. Or you can go cry to someone who gives a shit.

Because I really dont care about your moral finger wagging simply because I dont bow my head to your every word.

that's a funny way of saying "embarrassing inability to admit fault when presented clear evidence to the contrary"

That's a funny way to say, "I'm just a sperg lord on the internet who thinks actual lived experience means nothing to my Google ability." But it's ok. Spergs gotta spaz right?

"my subjective experience trumps facts because you're a sperg" nice argument mate

Hmmm... a report that could be biased vs boots on the ground looking at chemical weapons at my feet. Wonder which I will take. "Subjective experience" lol. By that metric all reports are "subjective experience" and should be thrown out eh?

>imblying there were any chemical weapons turned up by the said boots on the ground

imagine defending an administration which flatly LIED to justify a bogus invasion on a sovereign government

Not implying. I found this numnuts

^

He said that already

I did. My own eyes. Hell 1 was even set up in an IED dumbass

Thank gods it didnt go off

The Chlorine would have taken out near half my platoon.

so you're actually claiming to have personally stumbled upon chemical weapons munitions in iraq despite the only official reports of such being inactive specimens from the 80s

There's lots of shit that's not in 'official reports'

^

why would you omit the existence of the thing you justified the war on?

hey look, an offical statement

The existence of chemicals were never in doubt

wow much info

that's protecting their own methods

not the enemy

Fucking powel took a sample from an inspector from Iraq to the UN. Chemicals were never in doubt. The "in doubt" was the nuclear and biological.

The MSM were driving for confirmation on Nuclear or bust

Are you done putting your colossal finn foot in your obnoxiously loud mouth yet.

`so you're actually claiming to have personally stumbled upon chemical weapons munitions in iraq despite the only official reports of such being inactive specimens from the 80s`
so that's a yes?

<:gun_mouth:510320222365024268>

Yes. I ran into active artillery shells. 1 of which was strapped to 2 high explosive artillery shells as an IED, in Iraq. Do tell me when you are done crying that it wasnt in an official report because it was dismantled on site and disposed of.

We were lucky to have EOD on site with us that day imbedded

Yo guys when were laid doesn't matter as much. They still could be liable to blow. My mate is an ex-combat engineer. He was cleaning up chemical weapons from the 60s

This shit is dangerous no matter when it was laid

And we do know that chemical weapons were there

Yea I was a combat engineer. Time witch chems matter only with certain ones cause of decay however.