Message from @StevenStevens
Discord ID: 598713022340530197
You behave egoistically when you respect each other neither as possessors nor as ragamuffins or workers, but as a part of your competence, as “useful bodies”. Then you will neither give anything to the possessor (“proprietor”) for his possessions, nor to him who works, but only to him whom you require. The North Americans ask themselves, Do we require a king? and answer, Not a farthing are he and his work worth to us.
If it is said that competition throws every thing open to all, the expression is not accurate, and it is better put thus: competition makes everything purchasable. In abandoning [preisgeben] it to them, competition leaves it to their appraisal [Preis] or their estimation, and demands a price [Preis] for it.
But the would-be buyers mostly lack the means to make themselves buyers: they have no money. For money, then, the purchasable things are indeed to be had (“For money everything is to be had!”), but it is exactly money that is lacking. Where is one to get money, this current or circulating property? Know then, you have as much money [Geld] as you have — might; for you count [gelten] for as much as you make yourself count for.
One pays not with money, of which there may come a lack, but with his competence, by which alone we are “competent”;[Equivalent in ordinary German use to our “possessed of a competence”] for one is proprietor only so far as the arm of our power reaches.
Weitling has thought out a new means of payment — work. But the true means of payment remains, as always, competence. With what you have “within your competence” you pay. Therefore think on the enlargement of your competence.
This being admitted, they are nevertheless right on hand again with the motto, “To each according to his competence!” Who is to give to me according to my competence? Society? Then I should have to put up with its estimation. Rather, I shall take according to my competence.
“All belongs to all!” This proposition springs from the same unsubstantial theory. To each belongs only what he is competent for. If I say, The world belongs to me, properly that too is empty talk, which has a meaning only in so far as I respect no alien property. But to me belongs only as much as I am competent for, or have within my competence.
One is not worthy to have what one, through weakness, lets be taken from him; one is not worthy of it because one is not capable of it.
Aaaaaand you just signed your death sentence
Good job on spamming
well that went well
Cya Komrads
Happy gamer moment
Hardly spamming but i will do down as a true gamer boi
This was super low effor
^
Ces't la vie
k
Non
meanwhile, what do you actually think?
Scroll up
He thinks EU cock tastes good
I thought i could understand why some people hate the EU but coming here all i got was "German poo poo head" "Germany 4th reich"
TL:DR... if you can't use your own words, don't waste my time.
no one has a clue about how the EU actually operates and what are the constranints of each institution
try me
Don't be lazy scroll up
but you're quite right - it is very wrong to talk in terms of 4th Reich, but it is undeniably Socialist.
In what aspect is the EU socialist, as far as i'm awere there have been no strides made to seize the means of productions
Well, that's the fascist part
and there we have it people - pidgeonhole politics
Unless you're talking about "Socialism is when government does stuff"
then under this definition the EU is indeed socialist.
we're done here
@StevenStevens is an eu cock dribbler
Indeed.
of
talk about political control aspect of Socialism, try to hide behind economics... fuck off noob
oof
YEET
BRING IN THE HELICOPTERS
🚁
Enligthen me then @Jabba's Soapbox
FREE RIDE
@StevenStevens Ok faggot, why the fuck are you back here after nearly a year of inactivity?