Who the fuck would think otherwise?

lol

I guess the main difference between self defense in the UK and USA is reasonable force

You don't have to kill someone to defend yourself

You fucking savages

no excessive force, no revenge fucking them up the ass if they start running away...
...so basically be careful where you wound them (not in the back)

Well

Not that

I remember there was a case in the USA

Where a burglar was caught and he was running away

From the property

And the property owner hit him with a baseball bat or something

And the guy died

That is obviously fucking excessive

But ameritards aren't known for their intelligence

```That is obviously fucking excessive``` no fuck him

He could have been running to grab a weapon

`And the property owner hit him with a baseball bat or something
`
how is that excessive

smh

He's a fucking brit

Because he killed him

Point stands: self defense is illegal

Running to grab a weapon where?

Why wouldn't he take it with him

Are you fucking retarded

`Because he killed him
`
you don't know when you hit someone they're going to drop dead

are you talking about Tony Martin

In UK, if you keep beating someone after they have given up, it's excessive force

because those were gyppos

Hell, no one expects a death from a bat lmao

Well if you smash someone in the head with a baseball bat

Wtf do you expect to happen?

He threw it you said

That is excessive

I didn't say throw

The other problem is people thinking they can whack away with bats as if it's the movies

That's a problem?

Doesn't matter if it was point blank or thrown anyway

Do you know what "an eye for an eye" means?

It's about punishment being fit to the crime

Imagine having to lock up your knives, so you have to run past the intruder, and then punch in your combo just to fight back