Message from @Smak64

Discord ID: 410067995822653450


2018-02-05 13:31:37 UTC  

My entire stance is if he hasn't broken the law yet, he can't be arrested.

2018-02-05 13:32:17 UTC  

And I disagree entirely with conspiracy to commit ever being a crime, because the standard of evidence is going to see a steady decline as time goes by.

so I can plot to murder you and that's ok

what level of planning I'm I allowed before it's a crime?

obviously I know very little about you

2018-02-05 13:35:15 UTC  

You have to actually commit a crime before you can be arrested. Extensive planning is reason to surveil, but not a crime committed yet.

2018-02-05 13:35:27 UTC  

And plotting to murder me would be fine so long as you never actually do it.

2018-02-05 13:36:08 UTC  

If you're going to arrest someone who's plotting a crime, it has to be for possession of things that are illegal to have.

well I would break many laws before actually being able to do it

2018-02-05 13:36:26 UTC  

Yeah, if you break other laws, you get arrested for that.

2018-02-05 13:36:33 UTC  

But the conspiracy to commit isn't an actual crime.

but this guy is just talking about getting a big knife and running into a room of people cus they are gay

2018-02-05 13:37:03 UTC  

And if having the knife is illegal, arrest him. If it isn't, then you can't arrest him until he does something illegal.

so does the venue have a bouncer with a gun?

2018-02-05 13:38:00 UTC  

You're the one who lives in the UK, you tell me what the concealed carry laws are like.

You probably have to work for MI5

2018-02-05 13:40:14 UTC  

So probably not, then. There's an argument you can use for loosening of gun restrictions then.

2018-02-05 13:41:56 UTC  

Ultimately my issue with conspiracy to commit being a crime is if you're seriously planning it, you've undertaken actions which *are* against the law

2018-02-05 13:42:32 UTC  

so making the planning a crime is both
A: Just a way of putting them in for longer.
B: Going to see a lowering standard of evidence until the police just become mind-readers, like is the case with hate speech.

My isssue is that if this guy runs into a GayBar with a machete. The best defensive weapon anyone could have would be a Chair

2018-02-05 13:43:48 UTC  

Isn't having a machete in the gaybar a crime already?

2018-02-05 13:44:08 UTC  

before he even hits anyone, isn't that both disturbing the peace and intimidation

2018-02-05 13:44:50 UTC  

Lke I said, it's reason to surveil. If the police are confident he's going to do it, they can dispatch a few officers there in advance of him arriving.

Ok he enters

I call police on my iPhone

Police take 30mins to arrive

Police don't have guns, they have batons

<:what:382980756139409409>

2018-02-05 13:47:42 UTC  

" in advance of him arriving."

2018-02-05 13:47:49 UTC  

if they found he's plotting

2018-02-05 13:47:52 UTC  

they surveilled

2018-02-05 13:47:55 UTC  

they think he's going to do it

2018-02-05 13:48:00 UTC  

they send a couple officers

2018-02-05 13:48:05 UTC  

the officers are *already there*

but you also cannot follow him around 24/7

2018-02-05 13:48:30 UTC  

ask the NSA

2018-02-05 13:49:04 UTC  

In either case, you still can't arrest someone until they *break the law*

2018-02-05 13:49:31 UTC  

Because once you say "There are circumstances under which we will arrest someone before they've broken the law"

2018-02-05 13:49:43 UTC  

Those circumstances just start applying to more and more situations as time goes on