Message from @Ruggwain
Discord ID: 474670997757493268
I am talking about the general public
Yes? They need to see what the NYT really is.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/08/01/british-court-recognises-sharia-law-landmark-divorce-case/ Oh shit, I actually read it. My bad.
Read it
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAD IT
Wait
we did earlier
Isnt this about UK law supremacy over Sharia?
"The High Court ruled that an estranged couple's Islamic faith marriage, conducted in a ceremony called a nikah, falls under British matrimonial law despite it not being legally recognised as such.
It means Nasreen Akhtar will be free to bring her case to the divorce court and claim her share of the assets of her marriage where she previously would not have been able to."
Okay, I read it. My bad.
This is a good thing
Title is shitty
Women have Divorce rights even if they had a Sharia Marriage
Kind of a clever ruling
yeah they have alot of stuff about sharia here
@Ruggwain CSU + AfD pls
AFD-chan is unironically a thing cause right-wingers are degenerates
+ some CSU mascot
@Ruggwain you mean right-wingers are the only people with a sense of culture
don't be afraid, roach
so the guy calling people weeb trash is telling me to embrace a "chan"
I'm step 1
Franti you are step 2
Haidt is a fucking cuck, and isn't white. He doesn't give a shit
no u
"Guys, it's fine. Just let her vitriol go. *Just let it go.* It's fine. This is acceptable."
Fuck that, white people invented everything she loves and enjoys.
You think Haidt would be saying the same thing about Richard Spencer or David Duke?
I'm happy for her to write for the NYT
but I guess she'll be sticking to technology now
if I met her at a bar, I'd hide under a table
lol
Let the NYTs hire her
They will have proven that they are ideologically bankrupt
Alert the press!
It's long and it's girth is going to get bigger
and we are going to harvest the seeds