Message from @๐JIK Bleach๐
Discord ID: 474661590143205387
SO this woman is just a misguided person. (Snowden actually said her writting is kinda good)
How is attacking the far left any different than attacking the far right, like Richard Spencer?
@Fitzydog Depends how you attack them
By refutation
I would say that would be my duty to do
Demaning someone fired for their opinions? No.
This is the same as saying racists dont deserve a job
Do they deserve to live? Raise a family? Have a bank account?
Sword cuts both ways. Racism will not be tolerated, remember? So that means I don't want racism towards *me* as well
Not Cucking
Why should I tolerate any racism towards white people?
I'm Sarah Jeong and I LOVE Old White Men!
@Fitzydog You dont seem to get that I argue againts the point you just raised
You should not be fired for speech
but she's a writer my dude
You should be fired for speech, if your job is to be a mouthpiece for that business.
can she not edit her own posts?
I'm not allowed to say the n word
in any context
Should I be fired for my Facebook posts as a plumber? No one gives a shit lol.
As a public representative and Op-Ed writer? She can get fucked and run off to The Root or some other black supremacist news org
@Fitzydog By not fireing her the NYT just gave the right-wing media a free hit to further discredit them
?
Can you expand?
but they didn't cuck
@Fitzydog This is nail that sticks out
You can hammer it all the time
The people who will see this will get the impression the NYT cant be trusted
They can't lol
Do you honestly still trust them?
They need to die as a company already
I am talking about the general public
Yes? They need to see what the NYT really is.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/08/01/british-court-recognises-sharia-law-landmark-divorce-case/ Oh shit, I actually read it. My bad.
Read it
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAD IT
Wait
we did earlier
Isnt this about UK law supremacy over Sharia?
"The High Court ruled that an estranged couple's Islamic faith marriage, conducted in a ceremony called a nikah, falls under British matrimonial law despite it not being legally recognised as such.
It means Nasreen Akhtar will be free to bring her case to the divorce court and claim her share of the assets of her marriage where she previously would not have been able to."
Okay, I read it. My bad.
This is a good thing
Title is shitty
Women have Divorce rights even if they had a Sharia Marriage
Kind of a clever ruling
yeah they have alot of stuff about sharia here