Message from @Shurik

Discord ID: 476253262702444552


2018-08-07 02:55:55 UTC  

More or less kicking the can down the road.

2018-08-07 02:56:12 UTC  

Yeah, that's nihilistic as fuck.

2018-08-07 02:56:20 UTC  

๐Ÿคท๐Ÿป

2018-08-07 02:56:30 UTC  

I mean entropy

2018-08-07 02:56:57 UTC  

Eventually it wins. Hopefully not for a good long as time. And I want to make that as long as possible.

2018-08-07 04:51:01 UTC  

Isn't he technically correct? Considering that California is a 2 party consent state.

2018-08-07 04:51:57 UTC  

Hmm... I'm curious if that applies to public employees on duty

2018-08-07 04:55:52 UTC  

"Remember,ย even if youโ€™re in public,ย you cannot record conversations between two people unless you have their permission. ย This includes conversations that youโ€™re one of the parties to. ย If one person in the conversation can reasonablyย expect his or her conversation to be confidential, this standard applies.

If the person is standing on a soapbox on a corner, it does not. If the person is attending a government hearing and is speaking, it does not. ย If the person is shouting, yelling, or speaking to a large group of people without apparent concern for who might overhear him or her, it does not."

2018-08-07 04:56:23 UTC  

"You have the right to record video of police or public officials engaged in the performance of their official duties if those activities are visible from public places. "

2018-08-07 04:57:08 UTC  

If he was off duty would it still apply?

2018-08-07 04:57:34 UTC  

No, because he's not in the performance of his duties

2018-08-07 04:58:10 UTC  

I would like to see the first hand source on that information just because I'm curious

2018-08-07 04:58:23 UTC  

What info?

2018-08-07 04:58:45 UTC  

The link the the article is broken

2018-08-07 04:58:52 UTC  

I want to see the primary source

2018-08-07 04:58:53 UTC  

oh, I didn't realize

2018-08-07 05:00:12 UTC  

I don't doubt that it's correct I just want to see what's up

2018-08-07 05:00:26 UTC  

Considering I live in a 2 party consent state.

Poor Feedback will end your business

2018-08-07 11:53:16 UTC  

do migrant smugglers have yelp pages?

got to get your service out there somehow

so you need to advertise

shame I can see you on fucking radar cus we fucking invented it

2018-08-07 11:59:28 UTC  

"thank you come again."

I can see this fucking thing on radar, what hope does your boat have?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/dc/US_Air_Force_B-2_Spirit.jpg

Use the B2 to nuke them

Before the Second World War, researchers in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, the Soviet Union, and the United States, independently and in great secrecy, developed technologies that led to the modern version of radar. Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and South Africa followed prewar Great Britain's radar development, and Hungary generated its radar technology during the war.[15]

Development of radar greatly expanded on 1 September 1936 when Watson-Watt became Superintendent of a new establishment under the British Air Ministry, Bawdsey Research Station located in Bawdsey Manor, near Felixstowe, Suffolk. Work there resulted in the design and installation of aircraft detection and tracking stations called "Chain Home" along the East and South coasts of England in time for the outbreak of World War II in 1939. This system provided the vital advance information that helped the Royal Air Force win the Battle of Britain; without it, significant numbers of fighter aircraft would always need to be in the air to respond quickly enough if enemy aircraft detection relied solely on the observations of ground-based individuals. Also vital was the "Dowding system" of reporting and coordination to make best use of the radar information during tests of early deployment of radar in 1936 and 1937.

Given all required funding and development support, the team produced working radar systems in 1935 and began deployment. By 1936, the first five Chain Home (CH) systems were operational and by 1940 stretched across the entire UK including Northern Ireland. Even by standards of the era, CH was crude; instead of broadcasting and receiving from an aimed antenna, CH broadcast a signal floodlighting the entire area in front of it, and then used one of Watson-Watt's own radio direction finders to determine the direction of the returned echoes. This fact meant CH transmitters had to be much more powerful and have better antennas than competing systems but allowed its rapid introduction using existing technologies.

I'm from an Airforce Town ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

cus otherwise we'd be speaking German

You can google where I grew up

we had the thjird longest Airfield in the UK

if I give you a breadcrumb