Nature is a bitch trying to kill you and make it as painful as possible.

Which is why we created societies

The problem with humans is that the majority of them don't care if that happens to you, assuming that you don't take them down with you, because they are busy enough keeping nature off there backs.

That was a run-on sentence but I'm too tired to fix it.

Society is there to keep nature off everyone's back, and delegate it to someone else

A part of nature.

More or less kicking the can down the road.

Yeah, that's nihilistic as fuck.

🤷🏻

I mean entropy

Eventually it wins. Hopefully not for a good long as time. And I want to make that as long as possible.

https://thefreethoughtproject.com/cop-forgets-oath-constitution-filming/

Isn't he technically correct? Considering that California is a 2 party consent state.

Hmm... I'm curious if that applies to public employees on duty

http://resources.uscannenbergmedia.com/2016/08/videotaping-and-recording-in-public-in-california-the-basics/

http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/recording-phone-calls-and-conversations

"Remember, even if you’re in public, you cannot record conversations between two people unless you have their permission.  This includes conversations that you’re one of the parties to.  If one person in the conversation can reasonably expect his or her conversation to be confidential, this standard applies.

If the person is standing on a soapbox on a corner, it does not. If the person is attending a government hearing and is speaking, it does not.  If the person is shouting, yelling, or speaking to a large group of people without apparent concern for who might overhear him or her, it does not."

"You have the right to record video of police or public officials engaged in the performance of their official duties if those activities are visible from public places. "

If he was off duty would it still apply?

No, because he's not in the performance of his duties

I would like to see the first hand source on that information just because I'm curious

What info?

The link the the article is broken

I want to see the primary source

oh, I didn't realize

I don't doubt that it's correct I just want to see what's up

Considering I live in a 2 party consent state.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-44199790

Yell.com bruh

Poor Feedback will end your business

😄

do migrant smugglers have yelp pages?

got to get your service out there somehow

it's not cheap

so you need to advertise

shame I can see you on fucking radar cus we fucking invented it

"thank you come again."

I can see this fucking thing on radar, what hope does your boat have?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/dc/US_Air_Force_B-2_Spirit.jpg

Use the B2 to nuke them

Before the Second World War, researchers in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, the Soviet Union, and the United States, independently and in great secrecy, developed technologies that led to the modern version of radar. Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and South Africa followed prewar Great Britain's radar development, and Hungary generated its radar technology during the war.[15]

Development of radar greatly expanded on 1 September 1936 when Watson-Watt became Superintendent of a new establishment under the British Air Ministry, Bawdsey Research Station located in Bawdsey Manor, near Felixstowe, Suffolk. Work there resulted in the design and installation of aircraft detection and tracking stations called "Chain Home" along the East and South coasts of England in time for the outbreak of World War II in 1939. This system provided the vital advance information that helped the Royal Air Force win the Battle of Britain; without it, significant numbers of fighter aircraft would always need to be in the air to respond quickly enough if enemy aircraft detection relied solely on the observations of ground-based individuals. Also vital was the "Dowding system" of reporting and coordination to make best use of the radar information during tests of early deployment of radar in 1936 and 1937.