No idea how the fuck someone from F! became a repressentative tho

For article 13

Corruption that's how

want to go burn her house down?

she lives in Drottninggatan <:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>

@MountainMan social democrats and SD also voted for I believe

I wouldn't want to use a publicly traded VPN.

@Jas both voted no.

really?

Workarounds Exist

Social democrats did vote yes during the first one. Bit they misunderstood the thing and meant to vote no. So their vote was promptly changed.

Swedish democrats voted no immediatly

https://emanuelkarlsten.se/03/sd-s-fallde-chansen-att-rosta-om-artikel-13-och-11/

they messed up the chances of further changes to the law

THEY CLICKED THE WRONG BUTTON KEK

yep

are you kidding me

how cryptic is the voting for them to vote wrong twice

@MountainManwhat

@Jas Yeah they by mistake did the exact opposite of what they wanted

yep

fucking boomers smh

whole thing could’ve been scrapped if they clicked right

it could have been up for votes on changes if:
The Swedish feminist party FI would have voted yes instead of abstained
The Swedish Democrats SD would have pushed the correct button
The Social Democrats would have voted yes

@MountainManexplain

I just explained

jas just explained

neger e du svensk

There were two votes.
1. Whether the law should pass (won by a large margin).
2. Whether to allow additional votes on proposals to change the law.

ja

ay gatt

The second one only failed by a small margin.

And would have passed if FI would have voted yes, SD wouldn't have pushed the wrong button, and S would have voted yes

so yeah the feminists are partially to blame for that :>

https://www.wired.co.uk/article/brexit-march-peoples-vote-crowd-size?fbclid=IwAR3BYnA0e856Ld6wTLMbfehAzI4EZ1LvqBgOFaSvHrvf9lXITX7EaQSuDCE

@MountainMan lets burn her house down

Smullet charges dropped

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6852243/Charges-DROPPED-against-Jussie-Smollett.html

yea, and judge did seal the case so no one can request why it happend

cant have people snooping around a biast judge, it looks bad

Because we dont want the wrongthinkers to point out that they are wrongthinkers