<:high_iq:382980759012638731>

That he claims to only be bothered to speak the "non-inferior" languages, yet uses words coming from other languages, even from the "inferior" ones

But it's not French

The etymology may not be french, but the word itself is

<:thronk:441701565607444482>

<:think_madpepe:378717098630971395>

English has cannibalized useful parts from other inferior languages. That only means they had useful elements, not that they were superior.

<:high_iq:382980759012638731>

The English language is like the Borg

https://twitter.com/eldarmark/status/1122593321187041280

Sargon was potentially set up by fucktards at /pol/

Honestly it's prob true lol

Really easy to back fire on them

^

Its the creepy lawyer witness all over again

Does it matter in the immediate case? He's still gonna sue the Daily Mail

No soviet states allowed in the EU, bye Spain

<:oof:494878589406150657>

It was just a sexual emergency

```CAMPAIGNERS SLAM DIGITAL STRIP SEARCH```

"I WAS RAPED LUL!"
"W-what do you mean evidence? Don't you #ListenAndBelieve me?!"

Really, my step-grandad just got 18 years for their word over his. He admitted raping his daughter so him denying what he did to his sister is irrelevant. The cunt can rot in jail until he dies but this was meant to have happened in 1959, there’s no hard evidence but it still went through...

@Deleted User I want to report a rape but I Don't want to provide proof pls hlp

@Deleted User #notAllMen

Islamists of course would never rape

yeah, don't want their sexts to be entered as evidence... b-b-but false rape claims just don't happen

<:makes_you_think:382980749780844554>

https://twitter.com/V_of_Europe/status/1122840237447815170

sexts aren't concent

No turtwig that's victim blaming.

not consent, but could contain a degree of mitigation e.g. instead of people thinking he bashed her on the head and set about when she was unconscious - if she was texting saying what she would do to his dick if he came over then the sentence would not be as severe.

no it wouldn't

why would that be?

he said she said plus any evidence to add weight to one argument or the other - if we want proper justice then this is only fair - and that should include all papertrails available.

It's simply the argument of "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" brought into reality with a bang.

She could say the most filthy things by text and still back out

maybe she pulls down your trousers and realises your dick won't fit 🤷🏿

indeed, I'm not talking about people getting away with rape

simply that all factors should be taken into consideration.

---
imagine if the dick was too small and didn't satisfy - she mocks him via text and says she'll report him for rape because no woman should have to face such disappointment.
- convoluted perhaps, but that scenario could be proved with access to her phone.

Or the texts AFTER. "I regret what we did last night"

So if I flirt with a woman at work for months. Neither of us have any real intention of going further.

That going to be a feather in my cap in a rape allegation

I believe you understand the situation - this is not about justice, it's about forcing people to behave a certain way "just in case" something happens...
...in reality, I'm very much against the mantra of "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" - it's an incredible assault on privacy.