Islamists of course would never rape

yeah, don't want their sexts to be entered as evidence... b-b-but false rape claims just don't happen

<:makes_you_think:382980749780844554>

https://twitter.com/V_of_Europe/status/1122840237447815170

sexts aren't concent

No turtwig that's victim blaming.

not consent, but could contain a degree of mitigation e.g. instead of people thinking he bashed her on the head and set about when she was unconscious - if she was texting saying what she would do to his dick if he came over then the sentence would not be as severe.

no it wouldn't

why would that be?

he said she said plus any evidence to add weight to one argument or the other - if we want proper justice then this is only fair - and that should include all papertrails available.

It's simply the argument of "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" brought into reality with a bang.

She could say the most filthy things by text and still back out

maybe she pulls down your trousers and realises your dick won't fit 🤷🏿

indeed, I'm not talking about people getting away with rape

simply that all factors should be taken into consideration.

---
imagine if the dick was too small and didn't satisfy - she mocks him via text and says she'll report him for rape because no woman should have to face such disappointment.
- convoluted perhaps, but that scenario could be proved with access to her phone.

Or the texts AFTER. "I regret what we did last night"

So if I flirt with a woman at work for months. Neither of us have any real intention of going further.

That going to be a feather in my cap in a rape allegation

I believe you understand the situation - this is not about justice, it's about forcing people to behave a certain way "just in case" something happens...
...in reality, I'm very much against the mantra of "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" - it's an incredible assault on privacy.

--- but if there's reason to suspect collusion between witnesses, then there's reason to get a warrant for phone content.
After all, if it's text exchanges between perp & victim, then surely they could simply be accessed via the suspect's phone and not the alleged victim.

Jabba. This is my baby.

is that her kid?

i almost didnt recognize her

I was AFK... very nice, and yeah, understandable that you wouldn't want any wide boys chancing their arm when so many don't seem to know when to stop these days.

...and that applies to many of the police these days too.

There has never been a new law introduced that has not been abused - If people have nude selfies and clips on their phones, the coppers will copy them off and pass them around.

---
A couple of years back, they made it legal for all sorts of Home Office departments to access all files about you that they deem relevant - medical, criminal, you name it, and that includes departments from the top right down to local authorities...

...what could go wrong?

A family's asylum claim was rejected because of something the young (underage) daughter said during a session with a psychiatrist - one sentence said in what's supposed to be complete confidence between a doctor and patient - but Home Office could access the file.

Police State UK

kinda like people working at the NSA spying on their girlfriends and shit

yes, they will ALWAYS abuse their positions

they dont even need to say where the info came from either in order to fuck you
just having it gives them a decision making edge

@Deleted User what's up? It's a true story...

yeah I know

I literally treated him like my real grandad for 29 years

It's a beautiful world we live in

but again, I mentioned it because he denied he did anything to his sister in 1959

and her word was taken over his

as there was 0 actual evidence

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrBxhGYva04

but the fact he admitted what he did to his daughter clearly swayed the jury