Message from @Iridescent Rose
Discord ID: 576162740528349224
Nice
nice
Fucking dope. Tbh shrooms should be legal in the sense of psilocybin can be used to treat things like smoking and depression. The only problems comes from stupid people doing stupid things under the influence. Plus shrooms shouldn’t kill if they are dried correctly (since they are toxic fresh)
I remember when you could buy em here
Those were the days
Now I have to pick em like some trog
Honestly unban LSD the only problem that arises is long term exposure (possible mental problems it used over a long period of time [years]), and people doing stupid things but LSD doesn’t kill unless it’s not real LSD and is just experimental chemicals
Don't unban lsd
Lol
Plus micro dosing is something that needs research. But again people are stupid
Well not unban like decriminalize
But any other hard drug that has the potential to hook the user (heroine crack meth) should remain illegal given the damage they do to their communities
But when I say potential to hook I mean with lasting side effects even though alcohol is legal and so is cigarettes (but cigarettes don’t make you act stupid). The only reason we repealed prohibition was people who drank were going to jail and we had a rise in “speak easys” was which sold bootleg alcohol which could make you go blind if the bacteria used to ferment the alcohol turned it into the wrong kind like rubbing alcohol. Plus we had the mob and organized crime like we had the cartels and shit for weed which is why I’m more likely to stand behind weed legalization but maybe decriminalizing shrooms and LSD for research since people think they might be able to make possible treatments from them. But for LSD/shrooms I’d be carful since people are stupid and giving young stupid adults psychedelic drugs is a recipe for disaster
@SomeUser27 ok nerd
LOLOLOLOLOL... Prince Charles claims clergyman deceived him regarding child abuse...
...pull the other one Charlie
how was this shooting lawful
Because police immunity
you have to remember for a police officer to be charged with murder he need to execute the victim at the back it head at broad daylight at the town square and even then that is not a sure thing
People on the right in the US, who are pro-police will tell you that they need that immunity, else they second guess themselves in dangerous situations
.... Which is preceisly when they should be second guessing themselves.
yea. and the people that is tasked for investigation the police should not be a part of the police but a totally independent organisation
but even her in norway, the Blue wall of silence at the police is a huge problem <:pepe_sad:560202541904953365>
You clearly have no idea how aggressive those investigations are.
Everyone wants rid of the liability, they even try to get them to quit.
The level of scrutiny is incredible. Shit happens. I dunno what happened in this case, but it is very tiring to see constant vilification of people that save your asses.
They are basically paid with the expectation that they take a bullet rather than someone else.
Sure, but they make too many mistakes as well.
These are not the trained elites that you imagine. A lot of them are undertrained, overweight, understaffed, and are silent about corruption in their police unions
The investigative groups are independent. Internal affairs is an independent arm of the IG.
Does someone Remember which pro abortion law it was that by implication would've made it so that if you beat a woman and cause her to abort you would only get charged with assault
Because killing babies would be pretty much legal?
Never heard of that. It's always been you get charged with homicide of the baby. Kinda a major part of anti abortion arguements.
Or if you kill a pregnant woman you get double homicide.
Capitalism 👍🏿