The way you worded it before makes it sound as though you can be held without charges while a crime is investigated

there was already evidence @EnderOctanus

That is against Federal law

but he was seeming like the aggressor

The AG should step in

because of the current evidence

then more came out

But in your system, does there NEED to be evidence already collected, or are you waiting for the prosecutor to make a case while in jail? That is what we dont like.

no clue.

I just hope there will be some sort of backlash this ain't okay chief but again thank fuck he was in a Swede prison at least <:kek:590371888480387073>

no one has ever made a fuss about it

so I've no clue

Well

You can see why we would dislike that, since that is one reason we rebelled lol

out of everything I've heard and read, people want our prisonsystem and stuff to get harsher.

they have to make a plausible argument that it the right subject. in this care he had bruised hands and the other guy had a broken face

dont forget slashing wounds and images of asap holding a broken bottle @Nordhand

and there being glass shards at the area

If it also means gathering more information before being able to rightfully imprisoned someone sure make it as harsh as you want

and witness statements did at first make him the agressor

That's fine, if he was already determined to be charged before imprisoned.

they charge you the same moment as they determine if you are to be locked up until the court date

Being held in jails to die of disease for years was not uncommon for the earliest American settlers, and a key reason we demanded independence.

For no reason I should point out

We also had to accept soldiers into our homes, and feed them.

So to an American, if we think of that, it's really awful to us.

wow you actually remembered the 3rd amendment

Yep lol

aka the one no one fucking remembers or cites

Lost relevance pretty quickly. Would never risk putting your soldiers with enemy civilians now, except when we did it to the Germans.

Which. Was pretty wrong.

Should have just built barracks.

Let them sleep on the ground until they get their asses into a foxhole lmao

3rd amendment is only for peacetime btw

The Constitution never rests.

Though yeah you're right. The Germans had surrendered at that point however.

https://pressgazette.co.uk/british-journalism-awards-2019-now-open-for-entries-with-new-categories-added/

Hey look based award ceremony

Read it

I bet you can't help but laugh

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-49213743