arming teachers is actually a good debate

I would but it's still a debate

the problem would be making the teachers feel obligated to do so

I've never read or watched Harry Potter

as much as its a "good idea" youd have to get the teachers to unanimously agree

Out of all teachers I have ever met

if a handful dont want to do it in select areas

30% of them I wouldn't trust to have a weapon around students

And 100% of them I wouldn't trust to be able to shoot in a straight line

and even then that

would you feel any safer if teachers had guns

not really no

I would never force a teacher to carry

but if I was teacher I would

teacher would just be the first to get shot and suddenly the school shooter has dual wield

like I said it's a good debate

yeah, and youd be taking away from their already stretched teaching duties to ensure they were trained to actually use it

Trump logic: let's cut their budgets but spend money on arming them

oof

^

the added expense of doing it could be outweighed by the insurance savings

insurance savings <:GWcfcThonk:357907199928041473>

on arming teachers <:GWcfcThonk:357907199928041473>

well if you could verify a path of knowledge and training with it

yes

well you save on extra money you spend that's still extra money you spend <:GWcfcThonk:357907199928041473>

a driving instructor would get their personal insurance cheaper than most others as they would be more knowledgable about the rules on the road

yeah, but infrastructure is all about spending now to save in the future

clear your minds

Off topic, but do you guys see any way to fix the insane political polarization that we experience now

@Werlf civil war

no

without that

you gotta call out the bullshit immediately

well of course that

but outside of overthrowing government(s)

thats about it

make it hurt their wallets

great

it's rough atm but hold your horses

how is arming teachers increasing infrastructure for long-term gain

<:GWcfcThonk:357907199928041473>