Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 427411204097572875
Honestly, a Yes/No answer is what I'm looking for.
Not a retarded claim on our biological nature.
I am all for veganism when we can perfectly clone meat for everyone on the planet
Tasty meat
I am all for veganism when we can perfectly clone everyone on the planet for meat
<:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>
That's not a moral argument for the non vegan position @nic
Of course it's not, it's a shitpost you absolute unit
Who wants the debate?
Nonveganism is as immoral a position as not contributing to the field of researching synthetic meats.
Absolute cancer.
For the time being the nonveganism is a necesity for large part of the population that need nutrients
Anyone want the debate?
@Trebjonn Incorrect .
Who wants the debate?
the vegan diet is not suitable for everyone on the earth
or economically feasible
So you're asking for input on a debate, and you're calling everyone's responses cancer and incorrect.
Trebjonn is correct here
1st argument is incorrect 2nd argument isn't an argument that can demonstrate your position as moral.
So you would rather people starve or get malnutrition?
I'm looking for someone to accept the proposition, take the con of the prop and debate.
Ok, if Trebjonn isn't correct, you need to do a bit more than say "no he isn't" to change my mind
@Trebjonn Appeal to futility fallacies aren't arguments .
Y needs to do X therefore X is justified in all contexts across the board.
Saying an argument isnt an argument without a counter argument
Its an appeal to futility.
Nobody wants the debate?
Your argument was an assertion and irrelevant to your position being moral/immoral
Are you willing to debate us?
2-3 letters plz
I'm not responding
Unless you'll debate on vv
Vc
who is "us"
The royal us
he's king of the potatoes
The US of A
2V2
Who is supposed to be on your side of the argument