37 is greater than 0.

https://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/gcc/Version1.diffs/

how is fighting gay marriage libertarian

way i see it is

you either remove marriage from state or you include it

especially if it is a secular country

like America

I dont know how to use diffs yet, sorry

>To quote Michael Tiemann from Open Sources
```
The GNU compiler already supported dozens of host environments and over a dozen target architectures (I had written six of the ports myself ), making it one of the most widely ported compilers of its time. [...]
```

It's just a text file.

my bad

Because it was cheaper, in nineteen fucking eighty eight, to store and transfer a diff.

https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/old-releases/gcc-1/

You can find GCC 0.9 there.

cool, thx

if i prove myself wrong, so what? its a doubt

@JDM_WAAAT Hey, do you ever talk

Download the 1.21 archive, open the ChangeLog file.

This interview is *majestic* cringe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkkDvKGcNSo

the Pakman interview is easy enough to find

i got my training wheels on GPL software, i wont deny it

Do you guys pray to sargon like hes jesus

Or something

no

i mean i rarely see people even mention Sargon in <#372507611284766722>

Plain and simple: Stallman thinks it's immoral to make people use nonfree software. He doesn't demand people or companies to make their software free, but he insists that vendors allow people to write their own software. At no point he says that nonfree software shouldn't exist. Even that all software should be free. The focus is functional software. Games aren't functional, although components of the game might be.

nobody is making anyone use software

I never saw anything like that here

Actually other youtubers are being brought up more often than him

If the government is going to buy computers to give students to use, it's immoral that it forces them to use nonfree software. It's immoral to train people to use software that will lock them down into a vendor.

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/shouldbefree.en.html

dude my school had me on 1984 macs in 1994. who even cares what they do

We just recently had the scandal of the iPhones having their OS sabotaged to force people to upgrade.

Everything in there is right.

If you have no control, nor choice, for your software, you're at the mercy of the vendor.

i can agree on a number of points but i think he take it too far

youre still at the mercy of whoever write the software to license it in a way you find appropriate

People asked him, "what if I can't find a job that will pay me to write free software, only proprietary?", he responded "you shouldn't feel bad. If that's what you need to do for a living, do it."

So what is too far?

I never had to buy anything for school computers, everything I needed was already installed. Defaq?

Here's the trick: you paid for the "already installed" shit.