yes since the only cringe worse then bill nye is ken hams defence

no i heard he said some s††† but i didnt look into it much and i forgot what it was about

Faggotry.

i just googled ``bill nye faggotry``

the only useful thing in this query is his ED link

HA

Lol

Does anyone agree with the argument that climate change being caused by human industry is debatable?

Yes

Ive never really heard someone say this til recently and wondering if its worth looking into

it seems kindof convenient for some companies 😄

If the other sciences can be corrupted by post modernism and activism, then climate science can as well

personly i dont think it is debateable.

yes i agree it could easily be corrupted, otherwise id have no reason to doubt the current paradigm

There's too much at stake to look at any of the evidence rationally

i feel like any opinion i looked at would be heavily biased to one side or the other

and youre saying even though you agree its debatable you dont have a hard opinion one way?

yeah

you f†††ing *centrist*

We've been cutting emissions for years, since its highest in the Industrial era

the rate is the problem, not the change it's self and the rate has such a high correlation to human activity the absurdity to say the two are not linked is to say natural selection does not affect evolution.

pragmatically, you can't do anything useful about it

not true, WW3 would most likely solve it

XD

^

#BringOnTheNukes

A 13,000 year swing in temperature is not that unusual

I try to consume less of what i need less

i refuse to not run all my computers 24 hours a day tho

Or we forceably stop shithole countries from industrializing

If you can’t poo in loo, no cars for you

It is actually quite rare all the time it has happened in the past there have been very large mass die off.

whats the argument against shithole countries industrializing? theyll do too much damage, to save money?

To say the change has happened in the past therefore is not a problem is naive to what is happening

Thing is, there are a lot of externalities that the both of us can't accurately look at

Not to mention the fear mongering about it for the last 20 years

if we cant filter misinformation we have no hope for real data

Have not had the same fear mongering here. Just facts and lived experances.

You know how many scientific experiemnts can't be recreated?

That has literally nothing to do with the correlation data

Wait