Still, it won't be a steamroll

I was speaking more in lines with a long term engagement, considering things like military infrustrucure. But there is so many variables its hard to say because war isn't battled on just the battlefield anymore. There is things like technological warfare to consider.

FYI, Not a military expert.

I like the fact that the US has military bases all over the world

@muh_feelings
Technological warfare, asymmetrical warfare, the terrain

^exactly

As long as nukes and chemicals arent involved, US would most likely win

But nobody wins when nukes are involved

I mean, can you imagine an army trying to seize a city with millions of habitants?

With guns

The habitants i mean, lol

Yeah

Dont start with texas, all i gotta say

Go for Portland

Or Seattle

Don't forget that China has all the infrustructure in place to manufacture a shit ton of firearms and could easily arm its whole populace

Now i wanna watch “Red Dawn”

Yeah, but dont forgot, everyone in china already knows Kung-Fu

So basically already deadly AF

lol

Look, any army that invade a decent sized country will have a bad time

Fuuuuu, Ninja Soliders?

No, ninjas are japan

Dude, invade China

China has a billion

With B

It's impossible

So the clear strat is to just bomb all of china.

I mean

Who would make all our shit then?

Next world war people will take the gloves off and a lot of civilians will die

We gotta save the foundation

Yeah, i hope i aint alive to see next WW

I think the next world war will be primarily economic and information based.

Like cold war

Only less Cold

@muh_feelings
Nah, it will evolve eventually

I hope they just do online warfare

In video game competition

Everyone enlists in Battlefield 5

I give humanity like 100 more good years before living on the planet isn't worthwhile anymore because life will be just abject suffering at that point.