Message from @Mercury
Discord ID: 453326212035772417
Like descriptively, I could see that
Right, they wouldnt say that or admit thats their creedo....
I think you have described a very watered down form of fascism
if that's what you describe it as
Reading what Mussolini has to say about fascism paint a different picture
The Fascist State organizes the nation, but leaves a sufficient margin of liberty to the individual; the latter is deprived of all useless and possibly harmful freedom, but retains what is essential; the deciding power in this question cannot be the individual, but the State alone
Yes, its a cliffs notes version
sure
It is a direct quote
no thanks nigga
Who decides what is essential
and what is harmful?
On my life? Me
A state absolute is to say the moral leader (absolute not relative) its not a relative proposition.....yes, your folllow up is the key question
The key question is who decides
Is it based on an objective morality?
If its a liberal demcoracy "the voter decides based on changeable law"
That is why i believe in the Rule of Law
Dude, is there a neo-nazi here? That's rad. It's you against the world buddy! Get your convincin' gloves on!
Playin' on hard mode.
And republicanism
In the Fascist state there are principles which are bounded and not amendable by "voters"
right, (constitutional republic) right
Constitutional fundamentals that cannot be changed by a voter
Representative (not referendums) but representatives chosen by election
Nominated
Senators need to be appointed again
in some cases, I think you're getting in teh weeds
`freedom`
`all united towards a common goal`
so never.
Appointed by a group of elected reps
etc.
A push towards a absolute democracy is always bad
But all governments move left
even the fascists states that have existed
fascism is collectivist
The system at base is bounded or bracketed by electoral politics, elections, voters...
@Jek Porkins
As i said, fucking for virginity
Makes no sense
well its a matter of degree
That is true