we became what we were fighting

except we arent 1%ers

yuck, throw socialists out of helicopters, national or international.

It is a sad truth that you need to become authoritarian to defeat totalitarians.

Either way I'm set

I'd say that helicopters aren't entirely "authoritarian"

Ill be a mussie if I have to

I'd say it's more advanced version of shooting someone who tries to break into your home.

it makes me wish that i could go back in time just so i can set the occupy tent city on fire and purge these asshole from society

shadilay my dudes

I changed my mind after I saw videos of who was at occupy

kill myself in the process yeah but i got a death wish anyways

Or you can be like a good Lithuanian and continue the 800 year old tradition of burning yourself alive in protest ;D

Well the occupy movement may have had one good point.

the government shouldn't have bailed out the banks

what group of people Hung

Dirty hippies

Just weird cunts overall

I need to take the political compass test

Get to it then, it's not that long.

the problem is, the questions are often retarded

well then you got out at the right time, i was apart of one of the groups that had police come in and physically remove us

wasnt very fun

Yeah, but that's something you have to live with

Obviously I am a nazi

If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations. <--- this is a dumb question.

How so

I'm a right winger, but I don't believe that the economy should serve anyone or anyone

it'll shift you along the economic left/right axis

just leave it alone.

True

yeah but the "right wing" answer isn't something I believe in

Do it tho

so you'll have to go with the non-strongly answer then, since there's no neutral answer iirc

I forgot how dumb this thing was.

it's had little to no revision over the years, afaik

there are some pretty glaring "mistakes", from a methodology of social science perspective

Left-right scale is a weird mix of progressive-conservative and the preferred height of the social safety net. They don't necessarily go together and it's completely fair to have the opinion that "the choice between a progressive or conservative solution to any issue should be informed by science and reason rather than default preferences".

howdy f9olks

I usually see the science and reason approach lumped in with progressivism, in attempts at measuring political affiliation, which from the way I understand progressivism (not the modern American take) makes at least a modicum of sense