Message from @Legiondude
Discord ID: 463190083076620288
Big think
Should be m8
Indeed
KV-1E 4 lyfe
@A Random Crusader : "They were coordinated"
Too bad German tank vision plateaued basically after Panzer IV
Panzer IV wasn't even the most brilliant of designs; it just turned out to be extremely adaptable
Bonus irony that they developed the Panzer V with pretty much no ability to up-gun it
meanwhile..
German tank were not practical or reliable the true chad tank the M-4 Sherman
to complicated to expensive and not tested
"German tank" is a very broad term to be using
So is 'not practical', come to think o fit
Leman Russ Battle Tank best tank. So pretty.
*puts feet up*
German Tanks
you happy
nope 👌
Panzer IV was pretty basic in tech, but utilizing leaf springs just wasn't cutting it when you had to uparmor it, resulting it in bowing slightly forward for late models
But yes, the Chad M4
With the magic of modularity and a universal turret ring
Just found this gay social network site promoting founder of NAMBLA https://twitter.com/hornet/status/1012335189236899840
Meaning it could mount anything that the M6 or M26 could use
theoretically
Still puzzled at the decision to uparmour the hull but not the turret
Perhaps the smaller cross section
And that most gunners are/were taught to aim for centre mass
They did consider a simplified turret
the picture is too small, I can't tell if its a girl or a boy, but I don't care, I'll fuck anything that's cute
Cut out the cupola, expand the mantlet to the whole turret face, leave only one periscope for the commander
Naturally it didn't go anywhere
Also considered a sloped hull front too
Too heavy on the transmission though
And suspension
are you the one wearing a maid outfit and thighhighs in the picture? @Gallant
there's the irony though
they uparmour the upper and lower hull front