Which is bullshit

How

Ahh, but what wasn't decided was whether politicians can be limited in what they can *accept*

Capital doesn't have voting rights, people do.

What do you think is worth more?

The time spent of the media talking about you?

Or hard cash?

Time spent

Should we restrict the Young Turks for supporting bernie

Because that is worth more to him than cold hard cash

Should we put a restriction on how much the media talks about politicians?

Just because it can't be dealt with perfectly doesn't mean it should be left alone.

Where does it end?

You can't limit people's speech. But you can limit what federal employees do

It ends with politicians.

Once you start restricting what people can donate too

Can i not give money to the NRA?

Is the NRA a politician?

Corporations aren't people

They support politicians

this wouldn't restrict people giving donations, it would restrict corps.

We're talking about the finances of federal employees

Well according to the supream court of the US

Corperations are protected by 1st admentment

And the hatch act is different

The supreme court is full of shit.

???

Y'all are coming at this from the wrong angle

That is litterally not an argument

@Deleted User Neither is the appeal to authority with SCOTUS

It is what determines what is lawful

That is not an appeal to authority

They're quite literally usurping lawmaking powers. Something that they were never meant to heave. Just because they say something doesn't make it right.

It is telling you what is factually the case

SCOTUS has made several bad decisions or non decisions in the past

People have the power we allow them to have

Yes yes

Repeal the NFA

I was going to say allowing the fed to confiscate people's gold and make the dollar a fiat

That was under FDR