Message from @SaintHeartwing
Discord ID: 477644248699764757
it an excellent idea. it brings out the idiots in to the light for all to see
if you are free to think it why shouldnt you be free to say it
Because not all ideas are equal?
Don't you understand the "paradox of tolerance"?
do you understand the point of free speech?
@SaintHeartwing You should probably look up the court cases these companies have been involved in in order to skirt liability for their users content.
The idea is that if you just allow EVERYTHING, it will give rise to extremes that will gain power and use the exploitation of unlimited freedom to eventually kill all freedom but for THEIR People
wtf?
We already have limits on free speech because we recognize all speech shouldn't be unlimited
Are you rarted?
no it wont. The political system has nothing to do with speech
We don't allow slander, libel, defamation, shouting "fire" in a theater, child porn, etc, etc.
in fact, by silencing people you make people sympathetic
Oh, you are retarded
We decided to limit free speech to some degree because we get that having some basic standards is common sense.
Im all for giving anyone a big stage to speak on, if you are an idiot the world will see
No, they won't.
And if you don't believe me, I don't even have to point to Germany. I can point to DICK CHENEY.
Do any of you remember the 2000 VP debates?
I didn't know they made this brand of idiocy...
Lieberman was Gore's VP. he said to Cheney "I see you've been doing better than you were four years go". Remember that? And Cheney said "And I can tell you the govt had absolutely nothing to do with that." Remember that?
And guess what? People said CHENEY won that debate.
No I'm not a boomer
can we ban this guy
You could argue it helped push Bush into winning.
It proved Cheney was the better debater.
But the thing is...his point was wrong. The govt DID have something to do with it cuz Cheney's company had gotten SUPER RICH off military contracts
Jesús, he doesn't even want to converse, he just wants to rant
a lot of the time the better debater is the better choise as he looks more confident in the spotlight
I'm not following what he is saying
So the whole "if you just let people debate, the truth will come out" thing isn't true
It just means that the better debater will win
Even if his points are BS
That's my point.
well that's obviously True
Then get better n00b
most of the time no one will "win" a debate. all you do is move the people waching it in your favor
If people were smart and logical, that'd be true. But they're not.
People aren't logical beings.
Oh, you're a lefty
They're emotional ones