Message from @Fitzydog
Discord ID: 480440729454510091
The constitution was literally reinterpreted under Lincoln to have reason to go to war with the south
lets accept your premise
unconditionally
I don't think they should destroy those statues....as ugly as their history is, they are historical artificats
That's.... well understood?
At least put them in a museum
doesnt matter, the south left the united states, b/c they were losing a constitutional battle
and resorted to war to get what they wanted
The debate comes down to whether people think what Lincoln did was the right thing or not, and it's generally accepted that it was
treasonous
i dont care
to me that siliphism is meaningless
Okay, greyfag. Go have your hisssy fit elesewhere
sure lincoln was going to bend them over the constitution and destroy their way of life, i get it, they were but hurt
still doesnt justify treason and killing fellow americans in combat over it
forgot the pic lol
It wasn't treasonous at that point
what point?
when they left the uninon
or when they shot american soldiers in the field?
b/c when the shooting started they were in the wrong
With that logic, the Revolution was wrong
and all the us officers who left the union and fought for the south, including lee
it was
from the view of england
it was illegal to spurn your king
No
its a Wows streamer
and his law
fanserver
it is illegal to be a whining bitch
`lol it's DailyWire so this article reporting known facts cannot be true`
It's illegal to be a weeb
its Ben shapiro so cant be true
then someone links from TNYT
and had the american revolution failed, the ringleaders would have been hung
So you are getting butthurt and emotional over a 150 year old war about a certain interpretation of the constitution?