Message from @Goblin_Slayer_Floki

Discord ID: 488554164725612550


2018-09-10 03:35:44 UTC  

Welcome to marketing

2018-09-10 03:36:14 UTC  

This is the most retarded argument for surveillance I have ever heard

2018-09-10 03:36:15 UTC  

Would it make it better if they did?

2018-09-10 03:36:21 UTC  

No

2018-09-10 03:36:50 UTC  

@Fitzydog please keep it civil

2018-09-10 03:36:54 UTC  

Then a mute reasoning.
My suggestion, for an arguement on it. Go with a company that doesn't record everything per contract, and that you sign the rights to said recordings away.

2018-09-10 03:37:02 UTC  

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki Sorry, but last time I checked, these private companies didn't have a choice

2018-09-10 03:37:11 UTC  

Read your damned TOS/Contracts.

2018-09-10 03:37:30 UTC  

But that isn't YOUR right, that is the private companies rights.

2018-09-10 03:37:41 UTC  

All companies have to put that in there terms of service you can not avoid it at this point

2018-09-10 03:37:45 UTC  

And if the Companies (That have enough money to fight it in court) don't care.

2018-09-10 03:37:49 UTC  

Then...

2018-09-10 03:38:06 UTC  

They're barred from it, due to gag orders

2018-09-10 03:38:25 UTC  

Um no. A company can being a suit if they wanted to.

2018-09-10 03:38:34 UTC  

The state is extorting your private info from them

2018-09-10 03:38:36 UTC  

Gag orders do not prevent a Company Law Suit

2018-09-10 03:38:50 UTC  

It prevents individual, but not Company.

2018-09-10 03:38:58 UTC  

<:thronk:441701565607444482>

2018-09-10 03:39:00 UTC  

???

2018-09-10 03:39:26 UTC  

If the Companies did not want it, they can bring it up to a federal court and start the process.

2018-09-10 03:39:49 UTC  

You as an individual however, waved your right to those recordings/ect when you entered the contract and signed the TOS

2018-09-10 03:40:06 UTC  

There are companies that don't do that. Burner phones ect.

2018-09-10 03:40:15 UTC  

Again you cannot wave rights that are inalienable

2018-09-10 03:40:18 UTC  

Wasn't it the NSA who was recording these conversations prior to the phone companies?

2018-09-10 03:40:22 UTC  

Nope

2018-09-10 03:40:39 UTC  

AT&T and the like have been recording in servers for a LONG time.

2018-09-10 03:40:55 UTC  

Before even the Patriot Act which was the basis of the formation of the NSA

2018-09-10 03:40:55 UTC  

Citation needed

2018-09-10 03:41:23 UTC  

How do you think Courts could Supena phone/text records? lmao

2018-09-10 03:41:31 UTC  

Are you going to give me a citation or not

2018-09-10 03:41:33 UTC  

Is a wiretap a warrantless search, or not?

2018-09-10 03:41:42 UTC  

Give me a damn moment Ma

2018-09-10 03:41:48 UTC  

Fuck I don't shit sources

2018-09-10 03:53:11 UTC  

Does anyone have a link to the Swedish elections

2018-09-10 03:58:50 UTC  

Well fuck. I come with 2.
I didn't realize the NSA has been around since 52.
However, the part we are focusing on didn't start in earnest until 2010.
The Abruptness means the companies already had the infrastructure to do this.
As well calls themselves (As in recordings of) seems rather washy if they actually do that outside of calls "Recorded for Training Purposes" kinda thing. The FCC has regulations on this as well.
Recording Calls: https://www.techwalla.com/articles/how-to-retrieve-phone-conversations-on-verizon-wireless
https://engineering.mit.edu/engage/ask-an-engineer/are-cell-phone-conversations-stored-somewhere-and-are-they-retrievable/

2018-09-10 03:59:08 UTC  

'52?

2018-09-10 03:59:10 UTC  

Damn son

2018-09-10 03:59:29 UTC  

Yea the agency was far different back then

2018-09-10 03:59:39 UTC  

And there's been rumors of the NSA wiretap rooms being around for almost 2 decades

2018-09-10 04:00:13 UTC  

It's been almost 2 decades since 2001. lol