Message from @Onyxdood
Discord ID: 488553628597092353
If Snowden didn't violate the Security Clearance laws, he probably wouldn't have been touched. tbf
I doubt that
Regardless, what the NSA does to the people of America is in fact a violation of property rights and personal liberties
We shouldnt have to wait for a case to reach the SCOTUS to that fact to become apparent.
Is it? If you give a company the right to store your calls/texts/ect and the NSA taps into that, is that a violation of your right? Since you signed it to the company?
yes? lol
It is as these rights are inalienable that cannot be sacrificed willingly or not
I made a contract with the phone company, not the NSA
No because you signed it to the company, so the rights now belong to said that company.
The phone company owns that info now. And can sell, or give it away
Is the NSA buying it from the phone company?
Welcome to marketing
This is the most retarded argument for surveillance I have ever heard
Would it make it better if they did?
No
Then a mute reasoning.
My suggestion, for an arguement on it. Go with a company that doesn't record everything per contract, and that you sign the rights to said recordings away.
@Goblin_Slayer_Floki Sorry, but last time I checked, these private companies didn't have a choice
Read your damned TOS/Contracts.
But that isn't YOUR right, that is the private companies rights.
And if the Companies (That have enough money to fight it in court) don't care.
Then...
They're barred from it, due to gag orders
Um no. A company can being a suit if they wanted to.
The state is extorting your private info from them
Gag orders do not prevent a Company Law Suit
It prevents individual, but not Company.
<:thronk:441701565607444482>
???
If the Companies did not want it, they can bring it up to a federal court and start the process.
You as an individual however, waved your right to those recordings/ect when you entered the contract and signed the TOS
There are companies that don't do that. Burner phones ect.
Again you cannot wave rights that are inalienable
Wasn't it the NSA who was recording these conversations prior to the phone companies?
Nope
AT&T and the like have been recording in servers for a LONG time.
Before even the Patriot Act which was the basis of the formation of the NSA
Citation needed
How do you think Courts could Supena phone/text records? lmao
Are you going to give me a citation or not