Message from @Goblin_Slayer_Floki

Discord ID: 488553430940647437


2018-09-10 03:28:50 UTC  

And his safety would have been guaranteed in a situation like that?

2018-09-10 03:30:53 UTC  

The courts could order witness protection (United States Marshals Service). And if that is violated. Lets just say, even Clinton wouldn't get off on that.

2018-09-10 03:31:20 UTC  

Perhaps.

2018-09-10 03:32:25 UTC  

but tbh, NSA isn't as in with the other intel groups. Mostly because their creation actually took from the other's abilities.

2018-09-10 03:32:53 UTC  

If Snowden didn't violate the Security Clearance laws, he probably wouldn't have been touched. tbf

2018-09-10 03:33:38 UTC  

I doubt that

2018-09-10 03:33:54 UTC  

Regardless, what the NSA does to the people of America is in fact a violation of property rights and personal liberties

2018-09-10 03:34:28 UTC  

We shouldnt have to wait for a case to reach the SCOTUS to that fact to become apparent.

2018-09-10 03:34:55 UTC  

Is it? If you give a company the right to store your calls/texts/ect and the NSA taps into that, is that a violation of your right? Since you signed it to the company?

2018-09-10 03:35:07 UTC  

yes? lol

2018-09-10 03:35:19 UTC  

It is as these rights are inalienable that cannot be sacrificed willingly or not

2018-09-10 03:35:22 UTC  

I made a contract with the phone company, not the NSA

2018-09-10 03:35:23 UTC  

No because you signed it to the company, so the rights now belong to said that company.

2018-09-10 03:35:40 UTC  

The phone company owns that info now. And can sell, or give it away

2018-09-10 03:35:43 UTC  

Is the NSA buying it from the phone company?

2018-09-10 03:35:44 UTC  

Welcome to marketing

2018-09-10 03:36:14 UTC  

This is the most retarded argument for surveillance I have ever heard

2018-09-10 03:36:15 UTC  

Would it make it better if they did?

2018-09-10 03:36:21 UTC  

No

2018-09-10 03:36:50 UTC  

@Fitzydog please keep it civil

2018-09-10 03:36:54 UTC  

Then a mute reasoning.
My suggestion, for an arguement on it. Go with a company that doesn't record everything per contract, and that you sign the rights to said recordings away.

2018-09-10 03:37:02 UTC  

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki Sorry, but last time I checked, these private companies didn't have a choice

2018-09-10 03:37:11 UTC  

Read your damned TOS/Contracts.

2018-09-10 03:37:30 UTC  

But that isn't YOUR right, that is the private companies rights.

2018-09-10 03:37:41 UTC  

All companies have to put that in there terms of service you can not avoid it at this point

2018-09-10 03:37:45 UTC  

And if the Companies (That have enough money to fight it in court) don't care.

2018-09-10 03:37:49 UTC  

Then...

2018-09-10 03:38:06 UTC  

They're barred from it, due to gag orders

2018-09-10 03:38:25 UTC  

Um no. A company can being a suit if they wanted to.

2018-09-10 03:38:34 UTC  

The state is extorting your private info from them

2018-09-10 03:38:36 UTC  

Gag orders do not prevent a Company Law Suit

2018-09-10 03:38:50 UTC  

It prevents individual, but not Company.

2018-09-10 03:38:58 UTC  

<:thronk:441701565607444482>

2018-09-10 03:39:00 UTC  

???

2018-09-10 03:39:26 UTC  

If the Companies did not want it, they can bring it up to a federal court and start the process.

2018-09-10 03:39:49 UTC  

You as an individual however, waved your right to those recordings/ect when you entered the contract and signed the TOS

2018-09-10 03:40:06 UTC  

There are companies that don't do that. Burner phones ect.

2018-09-10 03:40:15 UTC  

Again you cannot wave rights that are inalienable

2018-09-10 03:40:18 UTC  

Wasn't it the NSA who was recording these conversations prior to the phone companies?

2018-09-10 03:40:22 UTC  

Nope

2018-09-10 03:40:39 UTC  

AT&T and the like have been recording in servers for a LONG time.