Message from @franti
Discord ID: 490588988927770624
Buck on attack
Okay okay
Since before the recoil buff
Defense?
@Deleted User only faggots and queers call grown ups cute
Hey peeps
Hello
@Fitzydog @Deleted User @radeon @Deleted User You can still have innovation without going overkill in profits. It's not a healthy market if only a select few companies dominate and are able to price gouge essential products.
I don't think anyone argues for price controls leading to financial loss
On defense it’s usually a 3 way split between Jäger, Mute and Smoke
Although echo is fun
We will have only a little price control
How will you tell?
Obviously it is too much in Europe
But muh democracy does not seem to care
there isnt. I dont see how in all hell in 6 years insulin had such a massive scarcity hike
diabetes didnt explode
cancer rates didnt explode upwards
the companies that charge for insulin are charging that much because they fucking can
They only care about muh low prices
Do I need to post the supply/demand graph and the effect price floors/caps have on it?
Please do<:pepe_sad:378719408345841664>
@Fitzydog @Deleted User oh lord. supply and demand. the thign that is totally never broken in a variety of ways
Fuck, those are terrible
Yea...
@Fitzydog that jpg quality is so bannable
the thing where companies will artificially keep supply low
or keep supply high and still charge a shti ton
because they can
invisible hand my ass
Government whore
once again a wikiepedia SVG file
Looks alright to me
HR 676 would give the National Expanded and Improved Medicare for All regional boards of governors (medical professionals) the authority to negotiate prices with pharmaceutical companies. HR 676 was drafted after consultation with medical professionals. Medical professionals support HR 676, as do many business leaders, because they don't want to have to continue to finance their employees' healthcare insurance with private, for-profit insurance companies.
No one said "medical professionals" were good at business lol
We should Nationalize the drug manufacturers and lace the export products to sterilize the rest of the world
Oh, you mean a state subsidized monopoly?
For the sterilization of the undeserving, yes
*So efficient.*
Well when your goal isn't profit but sterilisation it's a bit different
@Fitzydog don’t you know , economics is basically holy water for the gypsy?
I literally know of *one* monopoly that was actually successful, and that was the Standard Oil Company. But it was vertically integrated as well, so not really a good comparison to Nationalized industries or single industry monopolies
It was kind of like Amazon today, tbh. Each 'sector' was its own successful venture, bringing in revenue, subsidized by its sister ventures.
@Fitzydog the old monopolies were all highly succesful because of the pure amount they were able to do. problem was they were severe abuses of power and corrupted so much shit
being so large that the owner was still richer than jeff Bezos is right now is not a good thing
so rich that only the mansa musa and potentially Vladimir Putin are wealthier than you