np

The title of greatest polemicist belongs to Christoper Hitchens for sure.

I recall watching Sargon vs Styx vs the other dude

I don't remember who that was

Hitchens is what we desperately need right now

Kek

Gottem.

Was he a checkmark?

oh

typical twitter snowflake reaction nonetheless

so I just started watching sargon

from the beginning

once he got an actual microphone

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wPL-Ajd_Ro

Mind rape, kek.

@Tricerius Crowder seems very weak on this one, even by his standards. He failed to justify most of his arguments. I think he could have done better, if he had taken more time to formulate his thoughts more eloquently.

I'm not too sure about that. He was too emotionally engaged for that 2bh.

cant tell tbh. The kid was bad also, not so emotionally engaged, but he didnt really make his case well

Definitely. I did say the kid sucked.

love the "oooooh" part when the kid drops the word "autistic"

like, relax crowd, jeez

how sensitive are they

Yeah. The kid's dumb for resorting to ad hominem, but let's not act as if it offended anyone.

he can call whatever he wants as autistic or retarded

i dont care

Absolutely, but it does hurt the case he's making.

also "its very easy to argue from logic and syllogisms" ? thats one of the most stupidly untrue statements i have ever heard.

Arguing from pure logic is the hardest thing to do, because logic, and specifically propositional logic, aims to force us to accept a conclusion by eliminating all other options

I.e. its only logical if we can only reach X conclusion

otherwise, the argument is not sound

"autistic" as a phrase is retarded Keepo

kek

@DankMemez So all situations which might end with different conclusions are pseudo logical?

Not trying to strawman

actually asking.

@Tricerius situations? I dont know what you mean here

I am addressing what the kid said, about philosophy and logical syllogisms

Hm.

what situations? as in real things that happen?

real life events?

thats completely irrelevant