Message from @DankMemez
Discord ID: 568884465351393291
Arguing from pure logic is the hardest thing to do, because logic, and specifically propositional logic, aims to force us to accept a conclusion by eliminating all other options
I.e. its only logical if we can only reach X conclusion
otherwise, the argument is not sound
"autistic" as a phrase is retarded Keepo
kek
@DankMemez So all situations which might end with different conclusions are pseudo logical?
Not trying to strawman
actually asking.
@Tricerius situations? I dont know what you mean here
I am addressing what the kid said, about philosophy and logical syllogisms
Hm.
what situations? as in real things that happen?
real life events?
thats completely irrelevant
More like abstracts.
well i have no idea what you mean still
go study propositional logic, or at least go to wikipedia to get an idea, then you'll see what i mean
this is epistemology, and i guess you can say its an abstract
Look how easy it is:
P1. Elizabeth owns either a Honda or a Saturn.
P2. Elizabeth does not own a Honda.
C: Therefore, Elizabeth owns a Saturn.
the premises can only lead to 1 conclusion
that is what strong arguments based on propositional logic do
The best arguments make it impossible for you to reach any other conclusion than what is proposed
propositional logic is glorious
you could say its partly awesome!
....ok I couldnt help it. sorry
i understand, it happens
"whats immoral about inequality?" - Steven Crowder 2019
I dont know why you would even ask this question
Some people are dumber
<:think_woke:378717098681171988>
@DankMemez It's a good question though
It makes people think
no its not ffs
Okay, then answer it
Is it immoral?
sure, do you want me to answer if rape is immoral too?
fuck off
So.... inequality IS immoral?
I disagree