and they keep having in-universe ad pages which are ALL 'estrogen-free' or 'estrogen fighting' products for men

including estro-be-gone hand santizer to remove 'environmental' estrogen from surfaces

and estrogen free beer

'for real men'

I feel like the comic is trying to give a lot of sub-text which I am completely missing

That actually sounds like a good idea of femininity makes you weak to the disease

I'm constantly saying 'is that supposed to mean something?'

I think it's about men being super manly = bad - but they've screwed their own message by making estrogen the cure, which makes no sense.

I keep expecting them to circle back around and explain things but it just keeps getting more confusing

Oh, I would not expecting anything resembling sanity here. XD

I think you could make the case that they're mentally ill from just a couple of issues based on what you've said.

wait... no

one sec

https://np.reddit.com/r/GenderCritical/comments/bz84ti/maneaters_writer_chelsea_cain_deleted_twitter/ this one

Wow. Did they make that logo in Word 2000? Lol

thats just the cover of issue 9

Oh hello @Deleted User !

@Maxthx I delved into the comments there, and there's a lot of word salad.

Seems like they are blaming men for women apologizing when their own movement forces this kind of thing.

@Maxthx any more crazy stuff, or have you given up for today? Lol

oh sorry was making a sandwich, there is only 9 issues and I read all of them @Men Are Human The latest one they gave the 'activation' signal so maybe issue 10 will have more about their actual... plan

to overthrow the patriarchy with teenage werepanthers that is

@Men Are Human found the pdf

@James Thanks a lot!

@Deleted User Hello Nettle! How are you?

@Men Are Human @James that's an ok write up, but that doesn't reference the claims that specifically women who kill their partner are given more time than men who kill theirs, so it isn't a debunking paper

Oh that's a shame @InsaneCaterpilla . I haven't read it yet, and will have to look over it later.

Really the sources not existing should be enough. Demonstrate that in the article and its good enough, but try and back up with current actual sourcable statistics. We don't really need to debunk a claim which isn't proven

It's certainly enough for me. In fact, it's bizarre and malevolently dishonest behavior. The article would have helped to show others noticed it also, however.

my friend

wrote me a fucking paragraph

about the statement men are trash

and its so disgusting

does anyon wanna take a look lol

Hello @kyle . What happened?

Please do show us if you can.

ive literally tried to explain to her why one of her main points is wrong