well it's calif...alot of ppl with emotional issues

lol

https://www.eqca.org/ab-329-ca-healthy-youth-act/

"AB 329, authored by Assemblymember Shirley Weber, would update and strengthen existing law to ensure that students receive sex education that is accurate, comprehensive, medically accurate, age-appropriate and inclusive. LGBT students are too often made to feel invisible, or worse, stigmatized in health classes. LGBT-inclusive education has been shown to have a positive effect on school climate overall and make LGBT youth feel safer in school. AB 329 will thus lead to greater understanding and acceptance of LGBT youth and families. Additionally, the bill will update curriculum on prevention of sexually transmitted infections, HIV, and pregnancy. EQCA is co-sponsoring AB 329 with American Civil Liberties Union of California, California Latinas for Reproductive Justice, Forward Together, and Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California.

Status: Passed the Legislature. Signed by Governor Brown on October 1, 2015.

Author: Assembleymember Shirley Weber (D-San Diego)"

it's been amended a few times

look at the co-sponsors

it does however ban religion in it

yey! \o/

or restrict religion from the sex ed

lol sry

anyway after a quick skim it doesn't look like this bill describes anything specifically

it just refers to 'appropriate' materials

well u know the socialist left trans are in charge of whats 'appropriate' in the classrooms

first thing that caught my eye was a bit about how only the depiction of genitals in certain text books is considered acceptable

so then why attack that law?

lets see...when i was in school...sex ed was 12th grade only

well back then asbestos was considered a good idea 😛

then when my siblings' kids were in school, it was 8th grade for sex ed

sex ed can begin at age 5 or so, if done correctly

actually the asbestos was banned when i took sex ed for at least 10yrs

in fact, it will be done one way or another, if not properly, then horribly incompetently

usually by the parents

kids will ask where babies come from

well in the old days we'd say the stork brought them...now we just say - amazon

i was given an honest answer, and a book with the basics

at age 5 or 6 or so, it didn't damage me

lol amaztork

well it was either that or ups/fedex

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIUFlR8xHzw

i find it interesting that my dog repositions whenever i play ipot vids

lol

https://nypost.com/2019/09/16/oxycontin-maker-purdue-pharma-files-for-bankruptcy-protection/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nypdaily&utm_content=20190916&tpcc=morning_report&mpweb=755-8251076-719934549

@DaveyJones

Why does it matter? Because;
1. The state is not any child’s parent
2. This is desensitizing little children and all children to sexually explicit behavior.
3. Appropriate for the state is not appropriate at all. The state determining what is ‘appropriate’ means 4 years will be taught about anal sex.
4. The world you grew up in is nothing like this shitshow going on today. The book your parents handed you wouldn’t have turned into gender reidentification surgery.
5. My child, my right to not teach them about sex, sexual positions, birth control, and whatever nonsense my little children don’t need to know. It’s my business. They are my children.

This isn’t complicated. The state does not birth babies nor does it produce shit.

It seems as though you have no problem with this bill because you don’t think parents are educationIng their children about sex, well it’s our right not to. And yet I have no grandchildren by any of my unmarried adult children. SHOCKING

@Mary Poppins Well put. I wasn't a fan of the public school system when I finished. Nearly 15 years later, I have a child going in. Now all the reasons i hated it, and more, are again rearing their head. I agree, my 5 year old IS asking where babies come from. But I can explain it without getting into the details, and the degeneration that has nothing to do with reproduction.

The problem with the state teaching your children these things (and anythingfor that matter), is they have to package it up and deliver it in a uniform manner to everyone. While you the parent knows your child, what they know and don't know, what pace they can absorb the information, and the best way to deliver that information.

@Mary Poppins don't presume to know my life.

and nowhere in that law does it say anything about the actual material.

and #1: neither are many parents, and somebody has to protect children from stupid and shitty parents too

#2 there is nothing in that actual bill that says anything about the curriculum whatsoever.
#3 see #2, it is society that determines what is appropriate via consensus. if kids are being taught about anal sex it is because the entirety of LA has gone psychotic

@DaveyJones

Where am I “presuming”.

It’s public ed, what do you think they’ll use? Not hard to figure out