Message from @SirW00f
Discord ID: 623080767727337483
lol sry
anyway after a quick skim it doesn't look like this bill describes anything specifically
it just refers to 'appropriate' materials
well u know the socialist left trans are in charge of whats 'appropriate' in the classrooms
first thing that caught my eye was a bit about how only the depiction of genitals in certain text books is considered acceptable
so then why attack that law?
lets see...when i was in school...sex ed was 12th grade only
well back then asbestos was considered a good idea đ
then when my siblings' kids were in school, it was 8th grade for sex ed
sex ed can begin at age 5 or so, if done correctly
actually the asbestos was banned when i took sex ed for at least 10yrs
in fact, it will be done one way or another, if not properly, then horribly incompetently
usually by the parents
kids will ask where babies come from
well in the old days we'd say the stork brought them...now we just say - amazon
i was given an honest answer, and a book with the basics
at age 5 or 6 or so, it didn't damage me
lol amaztork
well it was either that or ups/fedex
lol
@DaveyJones
Why does it matter? Because;
1. The state is not any childâs parent
2. This is desensitizing little children and all children to sexually explicit behavior.
3. Appropriate for the state is not appropriate at all. The state determining what is âappropriateâ means 4 years will be taught about anal sex.
4. The world you grew up in is nothing like this shitshow going on today. The book your parents handed you wouldnât have turned into gender reidentification surgery.
5. My child, my right to not teach them about sex, sexual positions, birth control, and whatever nonsense my little children donât need to know. Itâs my business. They are my children.
This isnât complicated. The state does not birth babies nor does it produce shit.
It seems as though you have no problem with this bill because you donât think parents are educationIng their children about sex, well itâs our right not to. And yet I have no grandchildren by any of my unmarried adult children. SHOCKING
@Mary Poppins Well put. I wasn't a fan of the public school system when I finished. Nearly 15 years later, I have a child going in. Now all the reasons i hated it, and more, are again rearing their head. I agree, my 5 year old IS asking where babies come from. But I can explain it without getting into the details, and the degeneration that has nothing to do with reproduction.
The problem with the state teaching your children these things (and anythingfor that matter), is they have to package it up and deliver it in a uniform manner to everyone. While you the parent knows your child, what they know and don't know, what pace they can absorb the information, and the best way to deliver that information.
@Mary Poppins don't presume to know my life.
and nowhere in that law does it say anything about the actual material.
and #1: neither are many parents, and somebody has to protect children from stupid and shitty parents too
#2 there is nothing in that actual bill that says anything about the curriculum whatsoever.
#3 see #2, it is society that determines what is appropriate via consensus. if kids are being taught about anal sex it is because the entirety of LA has gone psychotic
@DaveyJones
Where am I âpresumingâ.
Itâs public ed, what do you think theyâll use? Not hard to figure out
#4 is pretty much the same argument
who are they?
No, itâs not the states right to take over any parenting
it's the states duty to protect children from the ignorance of their parents
No!!!
protect them against things like getting pregnant at 14!!
just cuz you are a parent doesn't mean u can be trusted.
NO
IT IS NOT