Do you define good in terms of promoting behavior?

yeah, so whats the specification outside of normalcy?

So you don't want to use natural or normal at all I'm guessing?

That makes it easier for me then

yeah, how would you improve their role in society

Well here is what I was suggesting

Good & Bad are subjective, morality is determined by which principles each party accepts

Any argument for Good must be justified by enabling a principle upheld by a party

@Deleted User havent seen you in awhile

I have risen

I believe we're different as homosexuals and heterosexuals are not the same, emotionally, sexually or mentally. I believe gender roles should be encouraged in heterosexuals and that should be a good way to distinguish the differences between gays and straights, for homosexuals I'd impose that they go based on classical greek homosexuality in which they're is no man or female. Just equality within the relationship, the Sacred band of thebes for example. They were on equal level and in result were one of the violent and most successful military unit. I feel gays and heterosexuals should be seen differently in regards to what they do in why. Things like marriage would go to heterosexuality because it falls in like with their gender roles and reproduction. Homosexuality has no use for that.

Today, gays and straights are integrated together

When we aren't the same at all

A straight man needs a female to finish that balance, but a gay man isn't like a straight man so that balance will not work out for him.

@RandomDiscordAccount

Who needs women when we're gonna have artificial wombs and sex robots

god damn it@Deleted User

Am I wrong?

Would you prefer that? @Deleted User

I do not see any difference in experience, only a difference in accessibility and outcome

@BabyHenry Thats more respectable I would say but its the minority opinion amongst those of this sexuality who are politically active. Maybe this is more of a symptom of the function of late stage democracy than innate homosexuality.

I'm 16 so

@Deleted User yes, no artificial wombs or sex robots. Just improve prenatal care to perfection.

Um, why would I settle for a 6 when I could just get a 10 right off the bat and program her to do anything I desire

Would men really choose to get rid of females?

Yes.

Genetic engineering and reproductive technologies topped off with automation have desensitized me to any desire for them

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZBD2tcKOU4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szsIMviFAv0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkeDqEXBGnc

Basically what you want @Deleted User

i hope you get robo aids i swear to god

Thats the best part, you don't get any aids

@Deleted User are you a trans humanist?

Not really, I just don't see a future for women

Ah

Its not that I hate women either, the marketable benefits of automating them are just superior, cheaper and more efficent

You're a weird fellow, but I embrace differences like that.

https://twitter.com/FrankTunde64/status/1277471862994370560

Its not gonna be that weird in 20 years if marketable demands increase steadily

I wouldn't get rid of females even if I could reproduce without them

They're goofy af, you cant make a robot goofy in the same manner.

@Carvo Yes you absolutely can