"Broke the algorithm" is nonsense. I can tell you with 99.99% certainty that this is not a thing. It's absolutely irresponsible for people to put credence in anything these desperate people say.

https://media.tenor.com/images/8278c492fd2f3f7d7d66a1fc29c0353e/tenor.gif

Ty!! Just just don’t know what to believe anymore!!!

Sadly, I have to watch it.

They shut him down so he doesn't incite another violent riot....national guard in DC for the inauguration...they realized the threat is real. Big tech reminding everyone they run the country.

This guy. He's been at it a while. Each new promise is freshly gospel just like the last. Anyway, here it is:

https://youtu.be/RjRxcK0kmao

The Italy Did it conspiracy theory has been posted here for days. I have a background in writing software for satellite based systems, so I have some knowledge about what they are purporting. It really doesn't make sense on any level.

Ah yes, election results we don't like is the equivalent of insurrection.

https://tenor.com/view/shock-disbelief-stunned-mr-bean-gif-9553766

okay...

....

.

lol

There's a difference between censorship and covering your @$$... People died. Families are going to sue. Social Media companies can't defend themselves saying that they did everything they could to prevent their platforms from being used if they don't take drastic measures. This is way more likely to be a reaction that their corporate lawyers told them they needed to take in order to minimize the potential financial hit when all of the wrongful death and excessive injury lawsuits are filed. They are the biggest pockets, so personal injury attorneys will focus on them.

Too funny... Only if the Pigeons were sitting on a pile of cash that personal injury attorneys could go after for a massive payday.

Everyone cares about being sued... Rich people and corporations hate to give away money.

Nice this will surely help.

Instagram is correct.

It really isn't though.

You also have to factor in public sentiment and the possibility of massive punitive damages. It doesn't matter what we think is likely, it's what their corporate lawyers are going to tell them is their possible exposure if they don't take certain measures. It's all very standard.

Unless your attempt is to misinform people.

Not at all, it is correct, 2 of those comments never happened during BLM.

Sure did.

I have no idea what you’ve been talking about...

If you're implying that them saying this during the BLM riots are somehow similar to saying it in 2018 for the Trump Administration and the other for "Children in cages" then I don't know what to tell you other than that's extremely misleading.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gab_(social_network)

Gab is an American alt-tech social networking service known for its far-right and extremist userbase.[3][4][5][6] Widely described as a haven for extremists including neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and the alt-right, it has attracted users and groups who have been banned from other social networks.

If you're banned from other social medias and join gab you are a far-right extremist neo-azi white supremacist.

It's always about money... It's not about censoring. They are information sharing platforms. Censoring is bad for business. The only reason to censor is if they think that not doing so will cost them more in the long run.

Glad you can only resort to weak strawmen.

Doesn't playing the victim get old?

@Gypsy, you just advanced to level 18!

I don’t think that was meant for me... but I do agree censoring is bad for business but that’s not stopping them. Personally I think it’s a terrible route to go down. You reap what you sow 🤷🏼‍♀️

No I think broken algorithms is exactly correct ... these mysterious Trump voters (some extra 500k in GA according to Trump) who cast these ghost ballots that no one can find literally broke the algorithms because the algorithms can't count these ghost ballots

I thought your post was funny... I was trying to add to it. It didn't work the way I wanted. The point was pigeons don't have money, so they wouldn't have to censor.

I agree.

I also think businesses have their right to conduct business as they choose, but I personally feel like many people should be trying to talk down sites from doing this, including the left. Censoring people and sending a movement underground (esp. this large) isn't a good idea.

Don't even know why you went there... Unless you wanted to abandon a possible exchange of ideas and viewpoints. I was trying to signal that we should move past, the unfairness of what is happening and discuss the underlying reasons why one might not put credence on the latest claims about Italy Did It.

Okay, then maybe this happening is a good thing if you want to create that argument? So that it forces a large movement to make an alternative?

It's not absolute immunity. Otherwise, there were would be no restrictions on content.

I mean you kinda strawmanned me and played the victim, which is why he said that.