Message from @Maw
Discord ID: 798484947576291348
more than 800
i wonder how much he will be left with by next week
People are about to learn how bad it's really going to get for those involved.
Ever wonder what it's like when 20-30+ people get charged with felony murder of one person?
No fear tactics there...riiight?
Trial ought to be fun.
aint gonna stick
you know there is such thing as a standard of reasonable doubt..... so this aint meeting it
Go look up the statutes for Felony Murder, (felony is being beyond the barricades on Federal property) then a death occurs because of the ongoing event of the felony. It is generally used to charge the getaway driver when the stick up man at 7-11 kills the clerk.
Everyone within about 20 feet of an officer getting his head smashed in with a fire extinguisher at least knew that the action of hitting someone over the head with a fire extinguisher could lead to serious bodily injury or death. And they failed to take action either to prevent or attempt to prevent it from occurring. So, tough shit as other's have said some people are going to learn what f*&k you in the a$$ prison really is.
We aren't saying that the people who didn't see it or weren't in the immediate area will be charged with Felony Murder. They are saying that the people who were in the immediate area failed to make even the smallest attempt to prevent, or reduce it, could be charged with it.
I know what a felony murder is, but there has to be no interceding or superceding events
-
cant spell
your last paragraph.... well
how would you define the zone of danger in a riot?
because I think that's somewhat what yo uare referring to
you are
No, that's not how the law works with felony murder actually.
ok, since you are a lawyer I am assuming
Even if you did nothing but drive a car for the murderer.
I mean, you could ask Robert this yourself.
He's talked about it multiple times before.
actually, if you drive the car that really depends on the circumstances... you can ask robert. Was murder before or after? did they stop for a burrito before driving further? etc etc
@Eden, you just advanced to level 13!
yes, that does work that way, because of the circumstances
The person you're arguing against -- the quote I gave, is literally a legal expert themselves. I guarantee you that Robert will agree.
I'll bring it up to him tomorrow if you'd like.
There you go, I never had to write a police report for it. I am absolutely making assumptions. My thought process is that a person at the event but not inside the area to prevent the death shouldn't be charged. But the lawyers have something different... Figures 😜
Thanks @Maw
let me explain.... @Maw
the shootout happened as they walked through the front door with the shootout itself being immediately after. 1)the suspect was a participant in the shootout (you cant say he was too far away, too close, or not part of the roberry 2) there were not superceding event
Definition of Superseding Cause
Noun
An unforeseeable event that interrupts the chain of causation, becoming the actual cause of the accident.
so... now taking this to the each and single rioter... 1) how would you describe participant? and prove that they were in fact beyond a reasonable doubt 2) they will have a perfect defense of there were 20 other people that were superceding causes to the death
""The common purpose may not have been to kill and murder, but if it was unlawful, as, for instance, to break in and steal, and in the execution of this common purpose a homicide is committed by one, as a probable or natural consequence of the acts done in pursuance of the common design, then all present participating in the unlawful common design are as guilty as the slayer.""