Message from @MaxIgnoramus
Discord ID: 632987532627279874
Because
You can look it up and see a different source and not know what he is seeing to draw his conclusion
@bible whore 1 its up yo you to rebut
Post something
I need the source to see the full info in order to rebut or not
Not just snippets
@bible whore 1 then your lazy
??
@bible whore 1
@MaxIgnoramus
Lol! The orbiters are in effect. I realize you're both desperate to discredit me becuz *(especially u Bible whore, considering Im on ur "shit list," as you've revealed),* but have a little dignity & don't be lazy. When one verfies details, they typically verify the info itself.
Did I miss something
I just asked for your source of information
@AZ infidel do you know bible whore is talking to operator?
You wanted sources from Fox last night (rightfully)
hellos
Now itβs rude to ask for them?
*iz summoned*
@bible whore 1 Be lazy then. That's ur burden. I don't cater to frivolous pursuits, & I'm not your babysitter girly. Have a wonderful morning. πͺπ β Bless you & Max in the name of Yahushua
@MaxIgnoramus yes, this somehow dtarted over my comment
To. @Deleted User
@Deleted User Iβm just asking for your source
*waves*
@Deleted User het
Okay, so can be changed by anyone
Hey
hey max
@Deleted User hello
@Deleted User. Waves back
hey bible
hi @NoOne
Wikipedia is not a reliable source
it's pretty decent
@Deleted User a stopped clock is right twice a day
wikipedia is sure better than encyclopedias
Not really it a beta test on control of information
well censorship of more controversial views is mostly from the public self enforcing
@Deleted User. Then use the wayback machine
always wondered about all the 90's webpages that had diamonds of great info that went poof
@Deleted User. Wayback
didn't capture everything
@Deleted User Dont rely on Wiki then, rely on the facts; in any scenario, factual details prior to Wikipedia aren't a creation of Wikipedia *(that would implicate Wiki as a promoter of facts in such cases).* Step ur game up & research as I have. Burden is on y'all to verify verifiable details when it correlates to your presupposed doubt. π That's all