> Pro-life personally; I have two daughters; and I’m premature and should’ve been aborted according to all medical opinion before I had the chance to even be a heart beat... Politically pro choice, having the tax payers only pay for Rape, Victims of Incest and at rush or teen pregnancy (after going through all options and acknowledge said teen has the proper understanding)
@nightstvlker
I have to say that you lost me when you said this 👆

a baby conceived of rape didn't have a choice in the matter

and you want to make the matter worse, by destroying it

same goes for teen pregnancy

Karnivore I agree with you 110%

if teens are physically capable of conceiving, then they need to carry the baby to term

I was 17 when I got pregnant. My dad said to me get an abortion OR Im selling your car. Without hesitating I said...Well go ahead sell the car

it causes far more destruction to both the baby (obviously) and the mother, by aborting.

You were very wise at 17, QoC

I personally wouldn’t that’s where I can see it ethically being allowed —- I erase all my morals and beliefs with these issues.

Same when you said this (you lost me):
> nightstvlkerToday at 11:31 PM
> Woman and men need as much freedom as they can get from government just because we don’t agree with the ethics doesn’t mean we can deny the freedom.
> What we can control is the tax payer money that funds it and how and when it gets used
> Also anything that can’t be handled with a pill is murder

You can't be against something, but say it's okay for others.

Especially not something like murder.

perhaps you hand wash your car, and I go through the automatic car wash

okay, so we differ on that

but you can't say you wouldn't kill your neighbor, but it's okay for someone else to kill your neighbor

it's like the demonrats always claim to be for helping the elderly, but pro abortion

those two things are NOT mutually exclusive.

Yes you can,

you are either for both, or against both

if you honestly beleieve that, you are deluding yourself

@Queen Of Conspiracy Hey how are you doing?

you are either pro life of the elderly AND pro life for the unborn, or you are pro death for both

you can't pick and choose.

at least not if you want to retain any sort of morality about you

Im okay Infinite. How are you? and ty for asking

@Queen Of Conspiracy I'm good, i've been stoked on a few things recently 🙂

going back to what you said once more:
> nightstvlkerToday at 11:31 PM
> Woman and men need as much freedom as they can get from government just because we don’t agree with the ethics doesn’t mean we can deny the freedom.
> What we can control is the tax payer money that funds it and how and when it gets used
> Also anything that can’t be handled with a pill is murder****

So you are for freedom of the woman, but not for the freedom of the unborn baby?

Can you not see how diametrically opposed that is?

that qualifies as insane

also, control of tax money is what is driving this for you?

how about, it's not written in the constitution anything about money for abortion or anything like that whatsoever

the federal gov't is only good for 4 things (in case you really want to be a constitutionalist, like you claim)...

#1 guard the country against invasion

#2 print and regulate currency

#3 provide honest national elections

and...hmm...it's late...I'm trying to recall #4

but we can start with those

Well so much for the federal government huh

AZ can help me recall #4