Message from @Lᵃʷ ᵂʳᵉⁿ

Discord ID: 782275806121558056


Az is in chat over there on that link

2020-11-28 05:44:18 UTC  

Really..ok cool

2020-11-28 15:53:42 UTC  

morning all

2020-11-28 15:55:49 UTC  

nice..lol

2020-11-28 15:56:22 UTC  

just got back from the store.. it's kombucha for breakfast

2020-11-28 15:56:36 UTC  

I like tea better than coffee

2020-11-28 15:57:59 UTC  

Yum. I've been randomly reactive to kombucha lately. I've got a bottle in my refrigerator and a scoby in a jar. Haven't been able to enjoy it in a while. Maybe soon.

2020-11-28 15:59:21 UTC  

Positive PA news from last night

2020-11-28 15:59:54 UTC  

well that sucks.. I love kombucha, it's like soda, but healthy for you

2020-11-28 16:00:33 UTC  

whats this good news? is it about the dominion raid?

2020-11-28 16:00:43 UTC  

I'm living in a less then ideal setting, I'm sure I'm hypersensitive because of my environnement

2020-11-28 16:00:57 UTC  

understood

2020-11-28 16:01:53 UTC  

No it's just PA court ruled the mail in voting is likely unconstitutional despite their attempt to rush the certification through

2020-11-28 16:02:17 UTC  

oh ok, good deal

2020-11-28 16:04:43 UTC  

I'm actually having difficulty finding anything on it besides Tim poole's commentary, which I'm not a huge fan of. He's a self described "milquetoast fence sitter". This is not the time for lukewarm positions.

2020-11-28 16:06:32 UTC  

i learned about him through joe rogan.. don't really follow him

2020-11-28 16:11:13 UTC  

I was following him for a bit but in his own words he doesn't know. All the time. He typically prefers the critical position adding "but I don't know" and he's often off the mark.

2020-11-28 16:11:48 UTC  

doesn't exactly scream confidence

2020-11-28 16:12:04 UTC  

I'm not looking for nostradamus, but I don't like the weak tea commentary

2020-11-28 16:12:09 UTC  

Yea exactly

2020-11-28 16:12:59 UTC  

Id be more inclined to listen to him if he took the critical position and defended it strongly. I'd find more value in that

2020-11-28 16:14:14 UTC  

i pretty much put most of my trust in mike adams, and AJ.. gatewaypundit..etc

2020-11-28 16:18:01 UTC  

I don't trust anything unless I've seen enough data that the position logically follows. That's why I like to see as many sources as possible. But I respect Jim hoft (gatewaypundit), and I can tolerate aj though he goes off the deep end regularly. It's more personality related than anything imo so it's not a big deal. Your boy Mike Adams is relatively new to me, I won't know what I think of his points until some of this plays out further

2020-11-28 16:18:42 UTC  

copy that..

2020-11-28 16:24:23 UTC  

What's a bit frustrating is how natural news and gateway pundit get smeared even though they've been supporting valid positions for a long time and they're not even out there like iw. Tim poole mentioned "I know gatewaypundit isn't the best source" or something to that effect once and I didn't know about the site at the time. I initially had this tabloidesque rag in mind, just because the popular mythology was repeated. Supression is so subversive.

2020-11-28 16:26:46 UTC  

it's our job at this point to filter out the double agent lies.. with so much information it's almost impossible

2020-11-28 16:28:09 UTC  

It's an undertaking, to be sure. Somebody's gotta do it though. There are too many people still asleep, they're not after the truth, though they need it.

2020-11-28 16:30:21 UTC  

And I may be naive in this but I tend to err on the side of believing people are as uninformed as anyone else, even if they are citizen journalists. I don't tend to think they're double agents or intentionally misleading anyone. They have to sift through all the same information we do. I just think they're people.

2020-11-28 16:31:36 UTC  

well, they know the info, the issue is, they become pressured/ corrupted.. and twist the information

2020-11-28 16:31:47 UTC  

Maybe so

2020-11-28 16:33:22 UTC  

I can see it happening based on their own self-interest more than external influences. Like pandering for likes and subscriptions. But I'm sure it's happening as you describe

2020-11-28 16:34:15 UTC  

for example.. I published an article on chemtrails.. asked my local newspaper director to post it... after reading it, she called me a loony, no way she was going to publish that.. even though there is clear evidence of chemtrails, she was biased? perhaps ordered to not publish anything relating to government programs?

2020-11-28 16:38:23 UTC  

See even in that situation I see a person who has been just as convinced by the media as anyone else. Chemtrails have been a disputed topic for a long time and the vast majority of people don't subscribe to the position you might hold. Even when presented with the evidence, people are locked into a worldview and discordant information confronts that and threatens to disregulate it. I just think that director thinks you're a loony because most people would also think you're a loony. People are asleep. The powers that be don't have to tell anyone to ignore the truth, they're already programmed to do that.

2020-11-28 16:39:45 UTC  

true. they aren't worried about truth now, cause people won't believe it even when it's in their face these days..

2020-11-28 16:42:11 UTC  

Yea, I mean if you already think you have it it's far easier to be ignorant of it when it's presented to you. No sense in rocking the boat. Imagine how your world would necessarily have to collapse of you let in a little bit of destruction. Truth hits the foundation, there's no going back once you start the demolition.