Message from @Lᵃʷ ᵂʳᵉⁿ
Discord ID: 782275080742764624
@BB_TRUTH goodness ! Good to see ya back!
I'll talk to AZ and see if he can make another discord..
@🔴🇺🇸❌😶silenced.again🤐❌🇺🇸🔴 I'm glad it's still here!! Good to see u 💯💯😊💜
Az is in chat over there on that link
Really..ok cool
morning all
nice..lol
just got back from the store.. it's kombucha for breakfast
I like tea better than coffee
Yum. I've been randomly reactive to kombucha lately. I've got a bottle in my refrigerator and a scoby in a jar. Haven't been able to enjoy it in a while. Maybe soon.
Positive PA news from last night
well that sucks.. I love kombucha, it's like soda, but healthy for you
whats this good news? is it about the dominion raid?
I'm living in a less then ideal setting, I'm sure I'm hypersensitive because of my environnement
understood
No it's just PA court ruled the mail in voting is likely unconstitutional despite their attempt to rush the certification through
oh ok, good deal
I'm actually having difficulty finding anything on it besides Tim poole's commentary, which I'm not a huge fan of. He's a self described "milquetoast fence sitter". This is not the time for lukewarm positions.
i learned about him through joe rogan.. don't really follow him
I was following him for a bit but in his own words he doesn't know. All the time. He typically prefers the critical position adding "but I don't know" and he's often off the mark.
doesn't exactly scream confidence
I'm not looking for nostradamus, but I don't like the weak tea commentary
Yea exactly
Id be more inclined to listen to him if he took the critical position and defended it strongly. I'd find more value in that
i pretty much put most of my trust in mike adams, and AJ.. gatewaypundit..etc
I don't trust anything unless I've seen enough data that the position logically follows. That's why I like to see as many sources as possible. But I respect Jim hoft (gatewaypundit), and I can tolerate aj though he goes off the deep end regularly. It's more personality related than anything imo so it's not a big deal. Your boy Mike Adams is relatively new to me, I won't know what I think of his points until some of this plays out further
copy that..
What's a bit frustrating is how natural news and gateway pundit get smeared even though they've been supporting valid positions for a long time and they're not even out there like iw. Tim poole mentioned "I know gatewaypundit isn't the best source" or something to that effect once and I didn't know about the site at the time. I initially had this tabloidesque rag in mind, just because the popular mythology was repeated. Supression is so subversive.
it's our job at this point to filter out the double agent lies.. with so much information it's almost impossible
It's an undertaking, to be sure. Somebody's gotta do it though. There are too many people still asleep, they're not after the truth, though they need it.
And I may be naive in this but I tend to err on the side of believing people are as uninformed as anyone else, even if they are citizen journalists. I don't tend to think they're double agents or intentionally misleading anyone. They have to sift through all the same information we do. I just think they're people.
well, they know the info, the issue is, they become pressured/ corrupted.. and twist the information
Maybe so
I can see it happening based on their own self-interest more than external influences. Like pandering for likes and subscriptions. But I'm sure it's happening as you describe
for example.. I published an article on chemtrails.. asked my local newspaper director to post it... after reading it, she called me a loony, no way she was going to publish that.. even though there is clear evidence of chemtrails, she was biased? perhaps ordered to not publish anything relating to government programs?