Message from @SayIDidIt™
Discord ID: 798103915673419828
well it's "islamophobic"
even though i personally don't think "phobic/phobia" belongs anywhere near islam seeing as phobia is an irrational fear
my fears about islam aren't irrational
Anything interesting? I can't handle more political videos right now... Unless it's breaking news. If it's just the same repeated rumors 🤯
he is just funny and talking about various things
no rumours so far
👍
<:Dude:726878886411108474>
Capitol Bad
Antifamarch
Not reported and peaceful
So quick story: I have a friend who’s “not a liberal” but is currently acting like one and is trying to tell me “the election wasn’t rigged” so I said how the mail has never been perfect with delivering things, but apparently that wasn’t enough to show how the election wasn’t fair. So if any of y’all have any good sources please ping me with a link. I would greatly appreciate it.
i mean theres the news where that bald dude was talking about all the thousands of votes from dead people, no signatures, empty lots, or brand new paper
Yeah but liberals aren’t that good at opening their eyes
or the 187,000 something biden votes in 1 hour in georgia after the told everyone to leave, when the voting machine can only process like max 5 votes a second
or the dominion software that was invented in i think cuba so that whats his name woudl never lose another election, and many states have made the software illegal because they recognize how easy it is to tamper
You'll probably get better results in <#797148988188786728> channel. More active and more for discussions.
Thanks
@TheWarriorAK "No ammount of evidence will ever convince a fool." Mark Twain
If you cannot both argue purely based on logic then there is no point.
If a person is so hell bent on just facts, its an uno game of "I have this fact." "well I have this fact."
Socratic method is more effective. Ask HIM questions, point out his flaws in logics with questions. By having to answer questions rather then ply them to you he will have to mentally assess things.
There is a guy who is retired now by the name of Mr.Metokur. He was a master of this. He RARELY ever brought facts to an argument unless it was regarding the persons reputation. He would simply take whatever evidence they gave him, look at it and say "Okay sure, but in your own words you said this which contradicts this."
Id encourage looking up some of his debates or live interactions that were not confrontational. Most of them have been purged from youtube.
But the man was a master of how to keep it cool, not lose focus and at the very least, expose someone to everyone else if they absolutely refused to be reasonable.
This, i find it more better to confront them with questions regarding the subject. Force them into thinking about their policy/belief that could make them question if they are right or not with their stance on things.
Most of the time they never bother with thinking, merely accept what they are told from 'sources'
If u think about it a lot of these "debates" come down to common sense. Like how the abortion argument of "my body my choice" can easily be proven wrong by stating that you made the choice to have unsafe sex in the first place, but now you want a choice in killing your baby?
Excerpt from a cnn article:
Republicans have to choose between “trumps base and the constitution” 🤣
Trumps constitutional base won’t follow the constitution? Damn, CNN said it, it must be true
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/626105093485363211/798188411445444638/ce2b47aab95a07df.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/626105093485363211/798189033201074206/e5c7df415af8e045.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/626105093485363211/798189058693267496/6d551d9490444ed0.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/626105093485363211/798189089778040852/ebf03571cce6aecc.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/626105093485363211/798189114402537484/99b0fc3b1837ad17.png
absolute genius
breaking the borken system, ironic
Making history
Twice on one president in one term