Message from Guan in Anticom #general

2017-07-01 06:06:52 UTC  

look at what is happening now

2017-07-01 06:07:09 UTC  

it comes down to tribalism, do you want degenerates in your tribe? if so then my tribe will win and yours will lose

2017-07-01 06:07:15 UTC  

mine will be more disciplined and healthy

2017-07-01 06:07:17 UTC  

tribalism is archaic

2017-07-01 06:07:26 UTC  

tribalism is inevitable

2017-07-01 06:07:27 UTC  

im going from the traditionalist perspective

2017-07-01 06:07:28 UTC  

encouraging people to behave in a certain way = fascism = communism

2017-07-01 06:07:37 UTC  

im neither 😮

2017-07-01 06:07:37 UTC  

i realize that's reductionist af

2017-07-01 06:08:02 UTC  

there's a difference between something being outlawed and something being discouraged though

2017-07-01 06:08:12 UTC  

but restricting social freedom, even by stigma, has an effect of discouraging general freedom

2017-07-01 06:08:34 UTC  

@Finesse I guess you can advertise throat fucking to female vocalists as some weird exercise

2017-07-01 06:08:41 UTC  


2017-07-01 06:08:47 UTC  

still not recommended ahahah

2017-07-01 06:08:57 UTC  

so by outlawing rape, I'm encouraging the suppression of other freedoms?

2017-07-01 06:08:59 UTC  

honestly I would recommend

2017-07-01 06:09:20 UTC  

or murder, or what have you

2017-07-01 06:09:36 UTC  

You can never recommend degeneratus

2017-07-01 06:09:37 UTC  

not really

2017-07-01 06:09:42 UTC  

rape violates other people's freedom

2017-07-01 06:09:49 UTC  

hol up

2017-07-01 06:09:55 UTC  

doing crack in an alleyway doesn't violate anyone else's rights

2017-07-01 06:09:58 UTC  


2017-07-01 06:10:07 UTC  

i dont operate under the premise that freedom is inherently virtuous

2017-07-01 06:10:14 UTC  

neither do i

2017-07-01 06:10:22 UTC  

then why use the NAP argument

2017-07-01 06:10:29 UTC  

but rape is a very different type of crime/degeneracy than doing crack

2017-07-01 06:10:30 UTC  

it implies that it is virtuous

2017-07-01 06:10:42 UTC  

@Anarchyng Of course, you know me. Always trying to SMASH the patriarchy. Trying to further female empowerment through assisting them in their goals, such as female vocalists; as you have mentioned.

2017-07-01 06:10:55 UTC  

I didn't imply that it's always virtuos, however social freedom is a goal

2017-07-01 06:11:20 UTC  

@Finesse its funny cause you know that this is exactly how some guys got laid. Took something they wanted to do and wrapped it in female "empowerment"

2017-07-01 06:11:21 UTC  

that said I don't know much about the NAP so if I'm unknowingly arguing in favor of it please enlighten me

2017-07-01 06:11:22 UTC  

but why is social freedom a goal if it isn't virtuous? shouldn't a functioning society be a higher goal?

2017-07-01 06:11:27 UTC  


2017-07-01 06:11:40 UTC  

"Trust me, sweetheart, if it wasn't for the patriarchy you'd be able to share me with your girlfriends."

2017-07-01 06:11:56 UTC  

the patriarchy is gay

2017-07-01 06:12:18 UTC  

the NAP implies that as long as you don't violate other's freedoms you may do as you please. this only functions off of the premise that the NAP, and by proxy, social freedom, is inherently virtuous

2017-07-01 06:12:34 UTC  

sure, i guess I agree with the NAP then

2017-07-01 06:12:50 UTC  

so in doing that you /do/ think freedom is inherently a virtue

2017-07-01 06:12:55 UTC  


2017-07-01 06:13:11 UTC  

@Guan the (((NAP))) was the best thing I woke up from, it only works if the behaviors people engage in are not harmful to the society which creates that freedom in the first place