Message from @DieHard300

Discord ID: 614937759823429665


2019-08-24 21:29:14 UTC  

lol

2019-08-24 21:29:29 UTC  

While it is rather dismal, another conservative justice would be awesome.

2019-08-24 21:29:45 UTC  

Right?!

2019-08-24 21:30:08 UTC  

I'd prefer someone closer to a constitutionalist, but that'd never happen

2019-08-24 21:30:17 UTC  

Because that's literally the purpose of the supreme court.

2019-08-24 21:34:33 UTC  

That's an ugly man, man.

2019-08-24 21:35:38 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/471844105463529472/614935878934200320/whenyouseethedank.jpg

2019-08-24 21:35:54 UTC  

Broom her fast

2019-08-24 21:36:06 UTC  

That other old cunt too

2019-08-24 21:36:08 UTC  

What's her name?

2019-08-24 21:37:28 UTC  

FGeinstein

2019-08-24 21:37:31 UTC  

as;ldkfj

2019-08-24 21:37:36 UTC  

Feinstein

2019-08-24 21:37:47 UTC  

Commiefornia, get your shit together

2019-08-24 21:39:17 UTC  
2019-08-24 21:39:29 UTC  

How can the babies be at risk?

2019-08-24 21:39:36 UTC  

It wouldn't be used if they were

2019-08-24 21:39:43 UTC  

<:Chad:565622815277973515>

2019-08-24 21:40:48 UTC  

Broom them fast

2019-08-24 21:41:40 UTC  

@ResolvingParadox13 Take a look to Thots and tell me you trust that to concieve a baby more than a Machine.

2019-08-24 21:43:06 UTC  

Or take a look to the amount of thing that can go wrong in a natural pregnancy and tell me that is more reliable than a Man made machine

2019-08-24 21:43:56 UTC  

@DieHard300 <:Bruh:590394149438619648>

2019-08-24 21:44:09 UTC  

Ofc I'd rather have this technology than deal with thots.

2019-08-24 21:45:06 UTC  

But every technology requires development and experimentation, over time. All I'm saying is that experimenting with human fetuses will be an ethical roadblock that anyone and everyone will use to argue against it and against mens' reproductive rights.

2019-08-24 21:45:50 UTC  

And if you think you've got the technology perfected before you use it for a human fetus? Don't make me laugh

2019-08-24 21:46:29 UTC  

All of technological history says otherwise. The first steam engines failed, had their flaws repaired, and then worked reliably. Not the other way around lol

2019-08-24 21:47:06 UTC  

You don't just "get it right the first time"

2019-08-24 21:47:08 UTC  

That's impossible.

2019-08-24 21:47:41 UTC  

That goes without saying, we are like a century far from having a perfect birthing machine, maybe more, and all technology requires to be tested for decades before it's put into use.
Doing otherwise would be negligence, I think we all are talking for that technology to take over the right way, not the boomer way.

2019-08-24 21:48:01 UTC  

Praise the Sun

2019-08-24 21:49:51 UTC  

<:yay:523032349563158528>

2019-08-24 22:08:29 UTC  

I wonder what percent of humans would go the route of machine births

2019-08-24 22:08:50 UTC  

Id imagine itd be a minority

2019-08-24 22:14:05 UTC  

Better for our machine babies @Revel

2019-08-24 22:14:15 UTC  

They'll have a huge advantage over normal babies

2019-08-24 22:14:27 UTC  

The virgin natural baby vs the Chad machine baby

2019-08-24 22:15:43 UTC  

If its your dna, how can u be sure

2019-08-24 22:18:20 UTC  
2019-08-24 22:27:32 UTC  

@Punished Korgoth the future we need but scientists need to hurry.

2019-08-24 22:28:54 UTC  

Gj Sweden

2019-08-24 22:30:58 UTC  

Hello gents!